[C320-list] Re: [c320] The SailNet Email Lists are back on line!

David J Gleason djgleason1 at juno.com
Mon Nov 14 20:48:48 PST 2005


While we are putting our two cents in, I thought I would add mine.   Does
Master Charge handle $0.02 charges?  I agree with Bill on his comments. 
One of the things that makes our boats so attractive is that we do have
an open web site.  How often have we seen posts from people who are
looking to buy a C320?  I do not think our honestly answering their
questions detracts from the C320.  I for one was impressed with the
amount of information I was able to gain from reviewing the lists
comments.  I have owned several boats prior to Proud Mary and was unable
to obtain any information on problems and solutions on any of them.  Keep
it open and we will be doing ourselves a great service.

Dave Gleason
Proud Mary, #150


On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:03:43 -0800 (PST) Bill Culbertson
<billculb_a2 at yahoo.com> writes:
> I'll chime in with Len and Allan re: "very well said, Richard".
>    
>   Here is a thought.  OK it stems from my being in the Engineering 
> field (albeit software) .  In Engineering, one of the first 
> questions is 'what problem are we trying to solve?'.  Engineers in 
> my experience and myself included, have a hair trigger for jumping 
> into brainstorming possible solutions.  It's what we love to do.  
> There is a standing joke around my company when someone comes up 
> with an idea with no apparent use that "it is a solution looking for 
> a problem".  You'd be surprised how often this comes up in real life 
> work situations.  Folks jump in with both feet trying to figure out 
> how to fix something.  Sometimes the right thing to do is to step 
> back and ask if something is broken.
>    
>   Any organization has a rubber-stamp goal of increasing its 
> membership.  Fine.  I've been a member of our association for the 
> five years I've owned my boat.  In that time, it's come up often 
> that we should increase our membership.  So far so good.  Sending 
> out appeals, extoling the virtues of membership and support, touting 
> Mainsheet and touting the annual regattas/meetings (3 of which I've 
> attended and totally enjoyed!!).  I'm totally fine with that.  But 
> at the end of the day and the end of each year, if our membership 
> stays fixed, so what?  Is there a problem?  Please think about it.
>    
>   Each annual meeting I've been to, the treasurer's report has 
> indicated that we are flush with cash as an organization.  That's 
> great.  It gives us huge flexibility, indicates we are healthy, 
> allows us to do things we want to do without worry.  Within the last 
> 18 months or so on Jeff Hare's recommendation, we switched our 
> website to a commercial provider for a measily $90/year.  Financial 
> health ensures we can easily do this sort of thing and that we can 
> sponsor the annual regatta/meeting each year which so many of us 
> enjoy so much, and it allows us to explore pretty much anything else 
> we'd like to consider.  
>    
>   On paper it sounds great to "increase membership".  It's kind of 
> embarrasing that well over 1000 boats have been built and our 
> membership is fairly fixed.  I don't recall the numbers offhand but 
> I think it is in the range of a few hundred.  So say 200 of 1000 
> isn't a high percentage, to pick a number.  But so what?  
>    
>   My bottom line is that to start denying services to non-members is 
> a major change of direction from our past.  Several folks have 
> chimed in that there are significant downsides to this and I agree 
> with them.  So before we start this change of direction and denial 
> of service and incur its negative effects, I ask "what problem are 
> we trying to solve by doing this?".  I submit that we don't have a 
> problem that needs solving.  So we shouldn't start messing with 
> things to fix this non-problem.  The organization is healthy as is.  
> We have good funding, excellent cash reserves, a bunch of committed, 
> active, dues-paying members, a great set of committed volunteer 
> leaders.  Tell me again the problem?  
>    
>   Is our problem that the percentage of owners who are members is 
> not "high enough"?  Why does that constitute something which needs 
> fixing?  Sure we have a goal to increase membership.  I'm for that.  
> But changing things to fix this is a mistake IMHO.
>    
>   Having said all of the above, "you better betcha" that if our 
> membership numbers start to fall off and/or if our funding starts to 
> dry up, then it's an immediately different situation which does need 
> action to address.
>    
>   Just like RichardG and others, I joined because it is the right 
> thing to do in my particular view of the world.  I want to keep the 
> association healthy on principle and because it's good for the 320 
> line. I was a member of USYRU (aka USSA) for 15 years and never 
> raced a minute during that time. I just joined because it was good 
> for sailing.  We all spend a ton of $$ on magazines and a bigger ton 
> of $$ on boat stuff.  I honestly don't think that as an association 
> we need to do anything to provide value for people's membership.  
> Joiners will join, non-joiners will not.  It's only folks on the 
> fence for whom increasing value of membership will affect our 
> membership #'s.  I'd bet that signing up ALL of those folks wouldn't 
> change our membership numbers enough to justify the change of 
> direction needed to get them to sign up.  That's just my hunch - 
> there is no data behind that guess.  It may turn out that on average 
> 20% of people buying a 320 will join on principle.  If that is true,
>  then we'll have our 20% year after year reliably without lifting a 
> finger.  If we keep lists & websites open so that the buyers form a 
> steady stream then we have a steady influx and we're fine year after 
> year.
>    
>   My $.02
>    
>    -bill
>    Bill Culbertson
>    Harmony #859
>    
>   
> Richard Grunt <RFGrunt at comcast.net> wrote:
>   I have owned my 320 since 1998, and prior a catalina 27 since 
> 1987. In general I am not a joiner, and the regattas aren't exactly 
> my cup of tea ( I did enjoy meeting many other members 3 years ago 
> in Baltimore the only annual meeting I have ever attended) but I 
> wouldn't think of not renewing my membership in the association. I 
> appreciate the fact that we have a group, with officers, who keep 
> things running, and a webmaster who has invested a lot of time and 
> effort on a volunteer basis to get our own list up and running. 
> Without an association this will all die. A very important point is 
> that the value of our boats is greatly increased by the catalina 
> organizations. They provide catalina owners a resource that other 
> boaters don't necessarily have, and this in turn helps to maintain 
> re-sale value - not that I plan to sell any time soon. The lists and 
> probably the web site should probably remain open and free. However, 
> those of us who use theses regularly should willingly chip in - I
>  mean $24 for the list and the mainsheet and the meetings, and the 
> commaradarie - its a bargain, and I feel the least I can do to 
> contribute to the effort. Its not going to keep happening without 
> some support. I would certainly rather support our own organization 
> as long as we have members willing to put in the time, than a 
> commercial operation that may or may not be there tomorrow. So any 
> of you who are regular users of the list and don't contribute should 
> do so because it is the right thing to do, and in the end we all 
> benefit, whether or not we take advantage of every activity offered. 
> I am posting this to both the sailnet and c320.org lists since there 
> have been so many posts to both lists on this subject, but I intend 
> to use the organization list going forward.
> 
> Richard Grunt 
> 514
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---- Original Message ----- 
> From: Orlando.Duran at AveryDennison.com 
> To: c320 
> Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 8:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [c320] The SailNet Email Lists are back on line!
> 
> 
> I was waiting for you to chime in on that one! :)
> --------------------------
> Regards,
> OD
> 
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
> 
> 
> 
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Wes.Giles
> Sent: 11/13/2005 05:25 PM
> To: c320" 
> Subject: Re: [c320] The SailNet Email Lists are back on line!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Picture me attempting to hold back and keeping my mouth 
> shut............
> 
> Wes
> ---------------
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
> 
> 
> 
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Orlando.Duran
> Sent: 11/13/2005 05:16 PM
> To: c320" 
> Subject: Re: [c320] The SailNet Email Lists are back on line!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Pontificate a lot....it has worked well for me.... :)
> 
> cuba libre 2
> --------------------------
> Regards,
> OD
> 
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
> 
> 
> 
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jeff Hare [Catalina at thehares.com]
> Sent: 11/13/2005 05:13 PM
> To: c320" 
> Subject: Re: [c320] The SailNet Email Lists are back on line!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> How do I get a job like that. :) 
> 
> 
> 
> At 08:02 PM 11/13/2005, you wrote:
> 
> 
> Jeff,
> 
> This are just my thoughts without getting to the nitty 
> gritty....think of me as a consultant, I don't actually DO anything, 
> I only think up of things and then suggest them.... :)
> 
> cuba libre 2
> --------------------------
> Regards,
> OD
> 
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
> 
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jeff Hare [Catalina at thehares.com]
> Sent: 11/13/2005 04:25 PM
> To: c320" 
> Subject: Re: [c320] The SailNet Email Lists are back on line!
> 
> Hi Guys,
> 
> How do you propose we tie Nanosec's MS Access database (which 
> we do not have dynamic access to at this time) into the Website's 
> MySQL based authentication and access rights system so that when 
> you pay your bill, you magically get access and if it expires, you 
> don't?
> 
> Not gonna happen if I have to do it... Sorry, but I don't have time
> to burn on making already complicated stuff more complicated and
> exclusionary..
> 
> Cheers!
> -JeffH
> 
> 
> At 07:04 PM 11/13/2005, you wrote:
> 
> 
> Dennis,
> 
> Again, I am not in favor or closing the mailing list to non-members, 
> I AM in favor of making parts of the web site (tech notes, etc) 
> available only to Assc members.....
> 
> I think any organization that charges dues should make SOME things 
> available only to dues paying members....I agree, Mainsheet (to me) 
> is not a big deal, hell it's mostly a forum for folks who flunked 
> creative writing in college......and you're right, the annual 
> regattas are not everyone's cup of tea and I respect that....that 
> said though, there has to be some things available only to members 
> in order to have a compelling reason to join (and pay dues).....
> 
> cuba libre 2
> --------------------------
> Regards,
> OD
> 
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
> 
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Dennis Harris [dharris02 at vol.com]
> Sent: 11/13/2005 03:49 PM
> To: c320" 
> Subject: Re: [c320] The SailNet Email Lists are back on line!
> 
> Another View....Maybe I've already been kicked off, but here is 
> another attempt to get my view posted, that of a non-member, but 
> avid C320 list follower. Please consider (and if you've already seen 
> it, please excuse the resend.):
> 
> There's always another view. Here goes from a non-member. I am not a 
> joiner of orgainizations. I will likely never attend the 
> orgainization events, because of distance, expense, and preference. 
> Nothing against the regattas, it's just not my cup of tea. As for 
> Mainsheet, you don't have to be a member to take it....I don't, 
> preferring Sail and Cruising World. I follow the mail list, which 
> until recently, was not a C320 organization document. The 
> predominent C320 list (one with most members, most participation) is 
> the one I want to follow, regardless of who sponsers it. During the 
> 6 years that I have followed it, I have found the list (first 
> Sailnet (bought a zodiac from them), then Sail Jazz (same people) 
> and now C320 Org.) very helpful. I have obtained useful information 
> from time to time from other owners who have been very 
> helpful....the most recent being in the past week when two people 
> gave me advice on removing compass to tighten screws to fix loose 
> pedestal guard. Dick Walker's
>  instructions were especially helpful. But it's not been a one way 
> street. From time to time, I've participated by trying to help 
> fellow C320 owners where I could by offering some personal inputs. 
> Occasionally, I go to the C320 org. and enjoy the articles there and 
> the photos of various owners and their boats. Still if I have to 
> join the organization to have access to the mail lists, I'll go 
> away....no big loss to the organization, but I fail to see what they 
> gain either. Others like me will gravitate to free lists like 
> Sailnet. That doesn't help the C320 organization, does it? The 
> inputs from and benefits for various owners becomes fragmented as 
> the number of lists and restrictions grow, so, to me, all seem to 
> suffer. 
> 
> It's possible that some non-members of the C320 organization, 
> through visiting your website might become interested and join, 
> whereas, if they have join, pay-up first (i.e buy into a plain 
> wrapped, sealed package without not knowing what they are getting), 
> they will just go away. 
> 
> Before I bought my boat, I was considering three different boats. 
> One of the most notable features in my search for information on 
> each boat before buying was that the C320 organization let one visit 
> the site, learn first hand experiences of others, determine whether 
> they really liked the boat. Other boat types had organizations also, 
> but the message was...join or you'll learn nothing from us....a real 
> turn off. The C320 organization was different, open and helpful, 
> glad to have me if I wanted to join, and if I didn't, would still 
> accept and help me on their lists. No doubt there are others who 
> have decided to buy C320's with the organization's input, whether 
> known or not. 
> 
> I hope you will think a bit more before you summarily close the list 
> and website to non-members. It's been great like it has been in the 
> past. 
> 
> 
> Orlando.Duran at AveryDennison.com wrote:
> 
> 
> Well, I agree with you, my wise and sage advice should have a 
> price.... :)
> 
> cuba libre 2
> --------------------------
> Regards,
> OD
> 
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adam Weiner" [esquirecatering at rcn.com]
> Sent: 11/13/2005 11:09 AM
> To: c320" 
> Subject: RE: [c320] The SailNet Email Lists are back on line!
> 
> You are, as always, right.
> 
> Remember, I am now, and always have been a member of the 
> association. I am a card carrying member as a matter of fact.
> 
> However, there are several boats in my marina that are not part of 
> the association. What very tangible benefits can I get them to join? 
> They pay a lot more to join the yacht club, which has tangible 
> benefits.
> 
> Perhaps the best thing to do would be require membership if they 
> want to receive e-mails from you. You are worth every penny of the 
> fee.
> 
> Adam 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Orlando.Duran at AveryDennison.com [ 
> mailto:Orlando.Duran at AveryDennison.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 11:05 AM 
> To: c320 
> Subject: Re: [c320] The SailNet Email Lists are back on line!
> 
> 
> Adam,
> 
> My suggestion was to close off that portion of the website that 
> deals with tech issues to members only....that to me would be the 
> value part of joining the Assc....
> 
> cuba libre 2 
> -------------------------- 
> Regards, 
> OD
> 
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Adam Weiner" [esquirecatering at rcn.com] 
> Sent: 11/13/2005 10:14 AM 
> To: c320" 
> Subject: RE: [c320] The SailNet Email Lists are back on line! 
> I think my point was, what have I paid nearly $200 for over the last 
> six years to be part of the association? The Mainsheet is OK, but I 
> wouldn't buy it as a sailing magazine if I did not get it "for free" 
> since only a few pages talk about 320's. Very few of the members go 
> to the regattas, and since the e-mail list is such a great benefit 
> as everyone agrees, and it is free, why join the association. (Gosh, 
> you don't even get a burgee when you join the association, you have 
> to buy it extra.) 
> 
> Regarding the upcoming regatta, I have met Dick Walker and seen the 
> Coronado Yacht Club, and I did it via the e-mail list, not via the 
> association. Don't get me wrong, both are wonderful, but I did not 
> do either as part of the association. 
> 
> I guess my complaint is that a number of people on this list 
> screamed, yelled, and sent out personal slams when Sailjazz wanted 
> to charge for the list, yet we are asked to join an association for 
> what end? 
> 
> By the way Orlando, why pay to join the association to read 
> technical articles when the same articles are on the website? Does 
> the website require membership in the association? If not, kind of 
> proves my point. If so, then why should this list be any different? 
> 
> Adam 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Orlando.Duran at AveryDennison.com [ 
> mailto:Orlando.Duran at AveryDennison.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 9:14 AM 
> To: c320 
> Subject: Re: [c320] The SailNet Email Lists are back on line!
> 
> 
> I think you misunderstood my posting, I am for a 'free' list 
> service....my musing was what about making the tech portions of the 
> website available for members only.....that was my point about 
> making membership value-add.
> 
> I'm no saying we should add charges additional to the Assc 
> membership, simply narrowing the scope of what you get WITHOUT Assc 
> dues...
> 
> cuba libre 2
> 
> -------------------------- 
> Regards, 
> OD
> 
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Van Vessem" [john at honn.com] 
> Sent: 11/13/2005 08:34 AM 
> To: c320" 
> Subject: FW: [c320] The SailNet Email Lists are back on line! 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: John Van Vessem [mailto:john at honn.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 8:27 AM 
> To: 'c320' 
> Subject: RE: [c320] The SailNet Email Lists are back on line! 
> 
> 
> 
> Orlando, 
> 
> 
> 
> The "milk" only has any value if everyone belongs. If all C320 
> owners are spread over 3 or 4 different email lists it will diminish 
> our collective intelligence. The real value to this email list, or 
> any email list, is the ability to pose a question or problem to a 
> large repository of experience. There is of course the option to 
> join all the mail lists, but for me I don't have the time to peruse 
> duplicate emails. Considering that the two email lists I have been 
> on have both had problems, one because of bankruptcy and one because 
> the owners wanted to get paid for their work only strengthens the 
> argument that we (meaning C320 owners) would do well to stick with 
> and support our own non-profit organization so we won't have to be 
> subjected to outside influences shutting the list down. 
> 
> 
> 
> John (Sojourn 645)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Orlando.Duran at AveryDennison.com [ 
> mailto:Orlando.Duran at AveryDennison.com] 
> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 4:31 PM 
> To: c320 
> Subject: Re: [c320] The SailNet Email Lists are back on line! 
> 
> 
> 
> Perhaps not the list it self, if you look at either the 36 or 30 
> Assc (not exactly sure which one) but they only allow Assc members 
> to access their Tech Tips or to receive the Tech CD....in any case, 
> the point is to make membership in the Assc have a more value-add 
> than just the Mainsheet.....why buy the cow when you can get the 
> milk for free..... :) 
> cuba libre 2 
> -------------------------- 
> Regards, 
> OD
> 
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Russell Monaco [russgm at yahoo.com] 
> Sent: 11/12/2005 04:19 PM 
> To: c320" 
> Subject: RE: [c320] The SailNet Email Lists are back on line! 
> 
> 
> 
> well there are many benfits to joining the asociation the most 
> obvious of which is the quarterly publication Mainsheet. Also, the 
> annual Reggatta would certainly count as a valuable asset. I would 
> like to know are you suggesting people not join the association? or 
> are you suggesting that the organization charge for access to the 
> web site. If it is the later, than how would you propose potential 
> buyers to look in to our boat? Would you force them to join the 
> association to simply to ask questions about a boat they are 
> thinking of buying? this is just one of numerous reasons why I do 
> not believe we should charge for access to our e-mail list, by the 
> way if we charge for access to the e-mail list, then why join our 
> fee based e-mail list, when cheryl at Sailjazz at the moment is 
> charging $12 to join her e-mail list, or is it $36? Or is it some 
> other number yet that I missed? I view our e-mail list as a service 
> our association provides to all C320 owners, and I hope that once 
> the join our
>  community they will join our association to obtain its other 
> benefits, things they can learn about while on the list. Do you 
> really want to exclude non-members from this list? 
> russ monaco
> 
> 
> Commodore C320IA 
> Escape 621 
> Stamford, Ct
> 
> Adam Weiner wrote:
> 
> 
> Then why join the C320 association? (Note, I just mailed my check.)
> 
> Adam
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Karl Mielenhausen [mailto:mielen at cox.net] 
> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2005 5:03 AM 
> To: c320 
> Subject: Re: [c320] The SailNet Email Lists are back on line!
> 
> 
> I agree, Dick. We should probably check here from time to time and 
> direct 
> owners to the organization site as they are more likely to find the 
> SailNet group first. 
> It should be pointed out that paid organization membership is not 
> required 
> to access the site.
> 
> Karl Mielenhausen 
> 2000 Catalina 320 #690 "Silver Lining" 
> New Bern, NC
> 
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 17:37:34 -0500, Richard A. Walker
> 
> wrote:
> 
> > I personally hope we now all stay on the C-320 list that is part 
> of 
> > our C-320IA organization which is C320-List at catalina320.com 
> > 
> > Cheers, 
> > 
> > Dick Walker 
> > 
> > C-320 (687) WindWalker II 
> > 740 Olive Ave. 
> > Coronado, CA 92118-2136 
> > 619.435.8986
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------ 
> _/) This list brought to you by the New Sailnet 
> _/) www..sailnet.com 
> _/) FAQ http://www.sailnet.com/listmgr/help/ 
> -/) To unsubscribe visit http://www.sailnet.com/listhelp/index.cfm 
> and 
> follow the directions
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------ 
> _/) This list brought to you by the New Sailnet 
> _/) www..sailnet.com 
> _/) FAQ http://www.sailnet.com/listmgr/help/ 
> -/) To unsubscribe visit http://www.sailnet.com/listhelp/index.cfm 
> and follow the directions
> 
> 
> Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click. 
> ------------------------------------------------ _/) This list 
> brought to you by the New Sailnet _/) www.sailnet.com _/) FAQ 
> http://www.sailnet.com/listmgr/help/ -/) To unsubscribe visit 
> http://www.sailnet.com/listhelp/index.cfm and follow the directions 
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or 
> entity 
> to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or 
> privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or 
> other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this 
> information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient 
> 
> is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the 
> sender and delete the material from any computer. 
> ------------------------------------------------ 
> _/) This list brought to you by the New Sailnet 
> _/) www..sailnet.com 
> _/) FAQ http://www.sailnet.com/listmgr/help/ 
> -/) To unsubscribe visit http://www.sailnet.com/listhelp/index.cfm 
> and follow the directions 
> 
> === message truncated ===  
> 
> 
>                 
> ---------------------------------
>  Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.  
> !!-  ______________________________________________
> !!- C320-List at catalina320.com mailing list
> !!- Subscribe/Unsubscribe Here: 
> http://mail.catalina320.com/mailman/listinfo/c320-list_catalina320.com
> 
> 




More information about the C320-list mailing list