[C320-list] FW: Re: Single Line Reefing

Karl Mielenhausen _/) kmielen at iwon.com
Thu Jun 8 06:21:20 PDT 2006


Better yet, this article (and many other fine technical articles) are on the C380IA website....

http://www.catalina380.org/article_display.asp?ID=114



A nicely organized resource for us also!!!!



Karl Mielenhausen

2000 C320 Hull#690 "Silver Lining"

New Bern, NC

http://members.cox.net/mielen/



From: Walter burnett [mailto: selkie2003 at yahoo.com]

To: C320-List at catalina320.com

Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 13:56:05 -0700 (PDT)

Subject: Re: [C320-list] Single Line Reefing



Irv,<br>   <br>  The pulley idea originally came from a Mainsheet article in the C380 tech section a year or two ago. If you have the back issues, you should be able to find it.  You rig the 320 reefing system excatly the same way.  Works great.<br>   <br>  Walter<br>  Selkie #887<br><br>Irv Grunes <igrunes at comcast.net> wrote:<br>  Stan,<br>Thanks for the reply. Again yours is an elegant solution and the fact that<br>everything is run through pulleys elimintes a lot of the friction.<br><br>If one would do the same to the leech luff, theneverything would be throgh<br>pulleys. Thats just a thought.<br><br>Did you do anything to the mainsail to protect it from any chafe by the<br>block working against it?<br>When the sail is down and furled, that block must just sit there and not<br>bother the sail cover.<br>As you can see I am trying to visualise any and all problems.<br>I realised that it will be necessary to change the reeving on the mast base<br>blocks so that the existing 
block will be the last block before the line<br>goes into the boom.<br>Irv Grunes<br>Isle of Wight #851<br><br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>From: C320-List-bounces at catalina320.com<br>[mailto:C320-List-bounces at catalina320.com]On Behalf Of Stanley<br>Rogacevicz<br>Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 1:10 PM<br>To: C320-List at catalina320.com<br>Subject: Re: [C320-list] Single Line Reefing<br><br><br>Irv,<br>I figured my explanation might come up short. The block stays with/at the<br>same level (well, maybe a couple inches below at most) as the reefing<br>cringle it replaced because the little line that passes through the<br>cringle/gromett is only long enough for attachment. When reefed the block<br>would end up in the boom area but since it is being pulled down by the block<br>at the mast base that's fine. My addition did involve switching a couple<br>block leads around.<br>I'm assuming as did a couple other posters that you already have a single<br>line reefing standard on your 
boat --- I did *-- I just wanted to reduce<br>the friction of the line passing through the reefing cringle by -<br>replacing - it with a block = less friction.<br>No... I don't remember the block I used. Many of my projects are simply<br>find what looks right and make it work.<br>Stan<br><br>>>> igrunes at comcast.net 6/7/2006 12:48 PM >>><br>Thank you Stan.<br>I think its a very elegant way to mount that block.<br>If you can remember the block you used it would be appreciated.<br>Also, with the sail fully raised about where did the block finally rest?<br>Did the block rest on the sail or was it at or just above the boom?<br>How did you keep the block from flopping around or did the fact that the<br>reefing line was through the block, it kept it from flopping too much.<br><br>If I picture it correctly, there is about two feet from the sail tack to the<br>luff reefing cringle, then you would only need to have that two feet to pull<br>it down. I assume there was enough room below 
the boom to pull it down.<br>Thanks for the reply.<br><br>Irv Grunes<br>Isle of Wight #851<br><br><br><br>-----Original Message-----<br>From: C320-List-bounces at catalina320.com<br>[mailto:C320-List-bounces at catalina320.com]On Behalf Of Stanley<br>Rogacevicz<br>Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 11:42 AM<br>To: C320-List at catalina320.com<br>Subject: Re: [C320-list] Single Line Reefing<br><br><br>Irv,<br>I did it, but it's one of the very few things I never posted a<br>picture of and it's a bit hard to describe. I used a large SS washer<br>(too big to pass through the grommet) with a small hole on one side<br>attached to a small block on the other side of the sail grommet. I<br>passed a small line (about 3/16) through the washer, then through the<br>grommet, then through the body of the block, then back through the<br>grommet, back through the washer, and then tied the two ends together<br>with a big enough knot to keep it from passing through the washer. Not<br>very elegant, but by 
not using any sharp metal objects for connections<br>it didn't damage the sail and did the job.<br>Stan<br>(formerly) Christy Leigh<br>c320 #656<br>Wickford/Narragansett Bay RI<br><br>>>> igrunes at comcast.net 6/7/2006 11:17 AM >>><br>Guys,<br>There was a thread a year or so back about single line reefing. I just<br>sent<br>the following to my boat partner.<br>Is there any album that shows what people used for the luff pulley<br>described<br>below and has anyone actually done this?.<br>I don't remember it right now, but there is supposed to be a way to<br>make<br>reefing a single line control by addig a pulley to the main luff<br>reefing<br>cringle. Then reeving the port side reefing line from the cockpit<br>stopper to<br>the deck mast pulley(where it now is), up through the new luff reefing<br>pulley, down to a new mast base pulley, into the boom then to the<br>leech<br>cringle as we now have it, then to tie off at the boom. The key being<br>a<br>pulley on a strap of some kind 
on the luff reefing cringle. The main<br>objection to this as I remember it, was all of the resistance that is<br>encountered by the lines going through all of the pulleys. This would<br>eliminate the need to go on deck in possible bad weather to reef the<br>main.<br>Irv Grunes<br>Isle of Wight #851<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br> __________________________________________________<br>Do You Yahoo!?<br>Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around <br>http://mail.yahoo.com <br>

_______________________________________________






More information about the C320-list mailing list