[C320-list] FW: Re: Single Line Reefing
McCullough, Kirk
kirk.mccullough at btg.com
Mon Jun 12 10:05:08 PDT 2006
Right on
Kirk L. McCullough
Boomerang #124
-----Original Message-----
From: C320-List-bounces at catalina320.com
[mailto:C320-List-bounces at catalina320.com] On Behalf Of Steve Magennis
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 9:44 AM
To: C320-List
Subject: Re: [C320-list] FW: Re: Single Line Reefing
You will also want to ease the mainsheet for the same reason. Don't
ease it enough to have the boom go wild and crack you on the head, but
if you were hard on the wind when you reefed, the only way to get the
reef clew down and tight is to ease both the sheet and the vang.
Steve
Alchemist #909
--- "McCullough, Kirk" <kirk.mccullough at btg.com> wrote:
> I have found that the vang needs to be released before reefing. The
> boom
> needs to be free to adjust to the new reefed sail shape. Once the
> reef
> is in, the vang can be reapplied as necessary.
>
> I suppose this is basic information, but it took me a few tries to
> get a
> nice reef in and I learned the hard way about the vang.
>
> Kirk L. McCullough
> Boomerang #124
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: C320-List-bounces at catalina320.com
> [mailto:C320-List-bounces at catalina320.com] On Behalf Of Walter
> burnett
> Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2006 10:47 PM
> To: C320-List
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] FW: Re: Single Line Reefing
>
> Jeff,
>
> The Reefing line on Selkie all runs on the port side, including the
> blocks in the sail reefing cringles. That lets the reefed part of the
> saill fall to starboard, avoiding the "crunch" problem. The line runs
> straight through the boom, no shuttle block.
>
> If anyone wants a turn by turn description, let me know, and I'll
> try
> to draw up a sketch.
>
> Walter.
> Selkie #887
>
>
> Jeffrey Hare <catalina at thehares.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I guess one point MFEMFE (and others) make is worth emphasizing. When
> Walter mentions dropping the main to a predefined point, marked on
> the
> halyard, this is a *really* important step. Dropping it too far
> before
> hauling in the reefing line makes it really easy to damage the sail,
> adds a
> huge amount of extra friction and the sail won't really reef
> acceptably.
>
> I used to make the mistake of easing the main halyard too far,
> hauling
> in
> the reefing line, then trying to tighten the main halyard to tighten
> up
> the
> luff of the sail.. Try not to do that. You really want to ease the
> main
> halyard until the Reefing cringle is roughly ?6"? above the boom and
> lock it
> in place. THEN start hauling in the reefing line. This keeps the
> reefing
> line and cringle from pinching the flaked sale against the boom. The
> luff
> will be automatically tightend simply by this process.
>
> My comment about adding a cheek block near the end of the boom was
> since
> the
> angle the reefing line pulls on the clew of my sail tends to want to
> over-tighten the foot but leaves the leach floppy loose, leading to
> the
> awful sail shape I mentioned. I thought some block out there could
> let
> me
> optimize that angle of pull. Still gotta think about that though...
>
> I really plan to do the C380 MFEMFE did.
>
> ONE QUESTION for MFEMFE: How do YOU run your reefing line?
>
> -Jeff
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MFEMFE MFEMFEM [mailto:selkie2003 at yahoo.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 1:19 AM
> To: Allan.Field at comcast.net; C320-List
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] FW: Re: Single Line Reefing
>
> Allan,
>
> I suppose a sacrificial wear patch under the blocks is the ideal
> solution,
> but I'm into my third season and as yet see no signs of wear on the
> sail.
> Perhaps it's the blocks I used (a couple of old Garhaurer's I had on
> hand)
> which tend to stand off the sail.
>
> In my case, the friction reduction was a lot more than "marginal".
> More
> like half the effort. It goes to show, what works for you, works for
> you.
>
> Walter
> Selkie #887
>
>
>
> Allan Field wrote:
> Walter - I assume that what you are describing is that you are
> mounting
> blocks from the cringles (the new tacks when the sail is reefed). I
> did
> this also and discovered that over time, the blocks wore holes in the
> sail
> where the furled sail was rubbing against a block. The blocks are now
> gone
> and patches are now where there once were blocks. I agree that
> reefing
> was
> marginally more smooth but not worth the wear and tear on the sail.
>
> Allan S. Field
> Sea Shadow - #808
> Columbia, MD
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: C320-List-bounces at catalina320.com
> [mailto:C320-List-bounces at catalina320.com] On Behalf Of MFEMFE
> MFEMFEM
> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 7:06 PM
> To: C320-List
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] FW: Re: Single Line Reefing
>
> All,
>
> Catalina (or maybe the delivering dealer) has rigged the single line
> reefing a number of different ways over the years. Being a compulsive
> jury
> rigger, I've rigged Selkie at least three different ways, including
> with
> the
> boom shuttle block and without it.
>
> I've finally settled on the "C380 article" rig with the single blocks
> in
> the reefing cringles and I can unequivocally opine that method is the
> easiest reefing with the least friction of any way that I've tried.
> Reefing
> is now easy to perform under way by simply spilling the pressure from
> the
> main, dropping the halyard to a predetermined point and taking in the
> reef
> line by hand. I don't even need the winch. The friction reduction of
> running
> the line through the blocks instead of the cringles is almost
> unbelieveable.
>
>
> Walter
> Selkie #887
>
>
> Scott Thompson wrote:
> Dave: Yours is just like my '99 boat except that line 1 does not end
> at
> the upper cringle. Instead it goes through this cringle (port to
> starboard) and then back down to be tied off at a padeye on the
> starboard side of the mast, just below the gooseneck. This additional
>
> part doubles the purchase on the luff, while adding a small amount of
>
> friction. The padeye also keeps the luff cringle close to the mast
> once
> you pull it down, which relieves stress on the sail slides near the
> reefing cringle.
>
> The advantage of this system over other single line systems that only
>
> use one piece of line is that you don't have to pull as much line
> through the forward cringle when you reef. So it has less friction
> than
> other single line systems that really use only one piece of line.
> This
> means it doesn't require the blocks on the sail that everyone else is
>
> talking about. It would work even better if the double block inside
> the
> boom were higher quality. But it works well for me and so I haven't
> bothered to change it.
>
> Another advantage of this system is that you don't have as much
> unrigging to do if you want to remove the mainsail. Just untie the
> forward and aft lines separately and remove from the cringles.
>
> The system is NOT the same as what is pictured in the manual for my
> '99
> boat, which is a bizarre system that does not have the reduced
> friction
> advantages I described above.
>
> OK, now someone will say that they think the block inside the boom is
> to
>
> add purchase. Wrong, wrong, wrong. It doesn't. But it does reduce the
>
> overall friction in the system, IF it's rigged as described above.
> It's
> almost useless if you rig it the way the manual suggests.
>
>
> Dave Anderer wrote:
> > Ok, now I'm more confused than usual. My rig - which I assumed to
> be
> > original - is significantly different than what is described in
> this
> > article.
> >
> > I've got one set of reef points, and a single-line system, but with
> 2
> > lines.
> >
> > Line one goes from the port clutches up to the gooseneck, in the
> boom,
>
> > around a double-pulley in the boom, back out the gooseneck, down to
> a
> > block mounted on the mast (where the vang is mounted to the mast),
> then
> > up through a cringle on the luff, and through a 2nd (higher)
> cringle
> on
> > the luff where it is knotted.
> >
> > Line 2 is secured at the outboard end of the boom, run inside the
> boom
>
> > to the double-pulley, and back out the end of the boom to a cringle
> on
>
> > the leech where it is knotted.
> >
> > Was that the factory-rigging on a '99? Seems awfully convoluted.
> The
> > modified 380 scheme seems significantly better.
> >
> > [Ah ha! Here is the rig I have:
> > http://www.catalina320.com/gallery/Alternative-Route/IMG_0226 Was
> that
>
> > how it came from the factory - I'm guessing not based on the
> comments
> > with this image.]
> >
> >
> >
> > Karl Mielenhausen _/) wrote:
> >> Better yet, this article (and many other fine technical articles)
> are
>
> >> on the C380IA website....
> >>
> >> http://www.catalina380.org/article_display.asp?ID=114
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> A nicely organized resource for us also!!!!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Karl Mielenhausen
> >>
> >> 2000 C320 Hull#690 "Silver Lining"
> >>
> >> New Bern, NC
> >>
> >> http://members.cox.net/mielen/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: MFEMFE MFEMFEM [mailto: selkie2003 at yahoo.com]
> >>
> >> To: C320-List at catalina320.com
> >>
> >> Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 13:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
> >>
> >> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Single Line Reefing
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Irv,
>
> The pulley idea originally came from a Mainsheet
> >> article in the C380 tech section a year or two ago. If you have
> the
> >> back issues, you should be able to find it. You rig the 320
> reefing
> >> system excatly the same way. Works great.
>
> Walter
>
> >> Selkie #887
>
> Irv Grunes wrote:
>
> >> Stan,
> Thanks for the reply. Again yours is an elegant solution and
> >> the fact that
> everything is run through pulleys elimintes a lot of
> >> the friction.
>
> If one would do the same to the leech luff,
> >> theneverything would be throgh
> pulleys. Thats just a
> >> thought.
>
> Did you do anything to the mainsail to protect it from
> >> any chafe by the
> block working against it?
> When the sail is down
> >> and furled, that block must just sit there and not
> bother the sail
> >> cover.
> As you can see I am trying to visualise any and all
> >> problems.
> I realised that it will be necessary to change the
> >> reeving on the mast base
> blocks so that the existing block will be
> >> the last block before the line
> goes into the boom.
> Irv
> >> Grunes
> Isle of Wight #851
>
>
> -----Original
> >> Message-----
> From:
> >> C320-List-bounces at catalina320.com
> [mailto:C320-List-bounces at catalina320.com]On
> >> Behalf Of Stanley
> Rogacevicz
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 1:10
> >> PM
> To: C320-List at catalina320.com
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Single
> >> Line Reefing
>
>
> Irv,
> I figured my explanation might come up
> >> short. The block stays with/at the
> same level (well, maybe a couple
> >> inches below at most) as the reefing
> cringle it replaced because
> >> the little line that passes through the
> cringle/gromett is only
> >> long enough for attachment. When reefed the block
> would end up in
> >> the boom area but since it is being pulled down by the block
> at the
> >> mast base that's fine. My addition did involve switching a
> >> couple
> block leads around.
> I'm assuming as did a couple other
> >> posters that you already have a single
> line reefing standard on
> >> your boat --- I did *-- I just wanted to reduce
> the friction of the
> >> line passing through the reefing cringle by -
> replacing - it with a
> >> block = less friction.
> No... I don't remember the block I used.
> >> Many of my projects are simply
> find what looks right and make it
> >> work.
> Stan
>
> >>> igrunes at comcast.net 6/7/2006 12:48 PM
> >> >>>
> Thank you Stan.
> I think its a very elegant way to mount that
> >> block.
> If you can remember the block you used it would be
> >> appreciated.
> Also, with the sail fully raised about where did the
> >> block finally rest?
> Did the block rest on the sail or was it at or
> >> just above the boom?
> How did you keep the block from flopping
> >> around or did the fact that the
> reefing line was through the block,
> >> it kept it from flopping too much.
>
> If I picture it correctly,
> >> there is about two feet from the sail tack to the
> luff reefing
> >> cringle, then you would only need to have that two feet to pull
> it
> >> down. I assume there was enough room below the boom to pull it
> >> down.
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> Irv Grunes
> Isle of Wight
> >> #851
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> >> C320-List-bounces at catalina320.com
> [mailto:C320-List-bounces at catalina320.com]On
> >> Behalf Of Stanley
> Rogacevicz
> Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006
> >> 11:42 AM
> To: C320-List at catalina320.com
> Subject: Re: [C320-list]
> >> Single Line Reefing
>
>
> Irv,
> I did it, but it's one of the
> >> very few things I never posted a
> picture of and it's a bit hard to
> >> describe. I used a large SS washer
> (too big to pass through the
> >> grommet) with a small hole on one side
> attached to a small block on
> >> the other side of the sail grommet. I
> passed a small line (about
> >> 3/16) through the washer, then through the
> grommet, then through
> >> the body of the block, then back through the
> grommet, back through
> >> the washer, and then tied the two ends together
> with a big enough
> >> knot to keep it from passing through the washer. Not
> very elegant,
> >> but by not using any sharp metal objects for connections
> it didn't
> >> damage the sail and did the job.
> Stan
> (formerly) Christy
> >> Leigh
> c320 #656
> Wickford/Narragansett Bay RI
>
> >>>
> >> igrunes at comcast.net 6/7/2006 11:17 AM >>>
> Guys,
> There was a
> >> thread a year or so back about single line reefing. I
> >> just
> sent
> the following to my boat partner.
> Is there any
> >> album that shows what people used for the luff
> >> pulley
> described
> below and has anyone actually done this?.
> I
> >> don't remember it right now, but there is supposed to be a way
> >> to
> make
> reefing a single line control by addig a pulley to the
> >> main luff
> reefing
> cringle. Then reeving the port side reefing
> >> line from the cockpit
> stopper to
> the deck mast pulley(where it
> >> now is), up through the new luff reefing
> pulley, down to a new mast
> >> base pulley, into the boom then to the
> leech
> cringle as we now
> >> have it, then to tie off at the boom. The key being
> a
> pulley on
> >> a strap of some kind on the luff reefing cringle. The
> >> main
> objection to this as I remember it, was all of the resistance
> >> that is
> encountered by the lines going through all of the pulleys.
> >> This would
> eliminate the need to go on deck in possible bad weather
> >> to reef the
> main.
> Irv Grunes
> Isle of Wight
> >> #851
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >> __________________________________________________
> Do You
> >> Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
> >> around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> This electronic message contains information from BTG Americas Inc.
> which may be confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from
> disclosure. The information is intended to be used solely by the
> recipient(s) named. If you are not an intended recipient, be aware
> that any review, disclosure, copying, distributing or use of this
> transmission or its content is prohibited. If you have received this
> transmission in error, please delete it and notify us immediately.
>
>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
This electronic message contains information from BTG Americas Inc. which may be confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be used solely by the recipient(s) named. If you are not an intended recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distributing or use of this transmission or its content is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please delete it and notify us immediately.
More information about the C320-list
mailing list