[C320-list] down wind in light air
Rod Boer
rod.boer1 at verizon.net
Fri Jun 23 16:02:37 PDT 2006
Dick,
Are you saying that the performance sailing at 165 relative with
occasionally jibing to reach a location dead down wind is better than using
a whisker pole and sailing direct downwind using wing to wing?
Rod Boer
Odyssey, #688
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard A. Walker" <dickwalker at att.net>
To: "'C320-List'" <C320-List at catalina320.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: [C320-list] down wind in light air
>I find sailing at 165 relative much better than 180 to the wind. The POLAR
> chart on the web site confirms that.
>
> My furling main with a lose footed main that allows me to let out the foot
> of the sail helps in a down wind situation. I also do not have the worry
> of
> an unintentional jibe.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dick Walker
> C-320 (687) WindWalker II
> 740 Olive Ave.
> Coronado, CA 92118-2136
> 619.435.8986-----Original Message-----
> From: C320-List-bounces at catalina320.com
> [mailto:C320-List-bounces at catalina320.com] On Behalf Of Lachance, Michael
> B
> (ISD, IT)
> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 9:51 AM
> To: C320-List
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] down wind in light air
>
> A question for the racers out there: Down wind in light air (less than
> 10kts) on a 320 with a pole but no spinnaker, are you better off going
> wing & wing straight to mark or broad reaching & jibing, i.e. running
> angles ??
> Mike
> Seychelle, #141
>
>
> *************************************************************************
> This communication, including attachments, is
> for the exclusive use of addressee and may contain proprietary,
> confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended
> recipient, any use, copying, disclosure, dissemination or distribution is
> strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
> the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this communication and
> destroy all copies.
> *************************************************************************
>
>
>
More information about the C320-list
mailing list