[C320-list] In Boom Furling

Richard A. Walker dickwalker at att.net
Fri Nov 24 14:44:28 PST 2006


Kirk it is the boat not the furler.  I know since I always was in the pack
at the 2 regattas.

Cheers,
 
Dick Walker
C-320 (687) WindWalker II
740 Olive Ave.
Coronado, CA 92118-2136
619.435.8986



-----Original Message-----
From: c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com
[mailto:c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com] On Behalf Of Kirk McCullough
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 2:24 PM
To: Allan.Field at comcast.net; C320-List
Subject: Re: [C320-list] In Boom Furling

A friend of mine just bought a used Morgan 38CC, with in mast furling. The 
boat is the slowest in the fleet, his old C30 Tall Rig was always in the top

3 so he's dissappointed. The sail is cut very high, has no roach and just 
wont drive that boat. I would definitely go with in boom furling over 
in-mast, or probably just specify an electric halyard winch with a standard 
sail.

Kirk McCullough
Boomerang #124

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Allan Field" <Allan.Field at comcast.net>
To: "'C320-List'" <c320-list at catalina320.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: [C320-list] In Boom Furling


> Don't forget that in-boom furling allows a full batten main which you 
> don't
> get from in-mast.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com
> [mailto:c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com] On Behalf Of
> Orlando.Duran at AveryDennison.com
> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 8:17 PM
> To: Catalina 320 List
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] In Boom Furling
>
> Yes, that 87 degrees is very important but I just marked the the topping
> lift line so it's no bother...
>
> I would much rather put up with the 87 degrees and gain the performance it
> brings and you're correct, in case of emergency, the sail can be dropped
> straight down...
> ------Original Message------
> From: Robert Seastream
> To: Catalina 320 List
> ReplyTo: Catalina 320 List
> Sent: Nov 23, 2006 3:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] In Boom Furling
>
> [Sent by: c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com ]
> I have in mast furling.  I've thought in boom would be better; in the
> event of a 'furling failure' I thought I could always manually drop the
> sail anyhow and secure it to the boom.  With the in mast furling, I'd
> have to figure out someway to secure it to the mast...and I'd only be
> able to reach so high.  The line below about 87 degrees being critical
> for in boom bothers me a bit.  I didn't know it was so fussy.
>
> Bob Seastream
>
>
> On Nov 23, 2006, at 11:10 AM, Orlando.Duran at AveryDennison.com wrote:
>
>> I love it so far, just follow the instructions about setting the boom
>> at
>> 87 degrees before hoisting or furling--very critical and the difference
>> between happines and 'oh shit, not again'........it's easy to handle
>> and
>> it performs very well....use lots of Mac Lube on the bolt-rope....
>> ------Original Message------
>> From: John Van Vessem
>> To: Catalina 320 List
>> ReplyTo: Catalina 320 List
>> Sent: Nov 23, 2006 6:35 AM
>> Subject: [C320-list] In Boom Furling
>>
>> [Sent by: c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com ]
>> Orlando,
>>
>> Mind telling us all what your thoughts are about your in boom furling.
>> Any issues, likes, dislikes?
>>
>> John Van Vessem
>> Sojourn 645
>> Vallejo Yacht Club
>>
>> ----------------------------------
>> Regards,
>> OD
>>
>> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------
>> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
>> to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
>> privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or
>> other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this
>> information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient
>> is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the
>> sender and delete the material from any computer.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------
> Regards,
> OD
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
>
>
> --------------------------------
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
> to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
> privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or
> other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this
> information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient
> is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the
> sender and delete the material from any computer.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 







More information about the C320-list mailing list