[C320-list] TV Antenna

Frank Drahos res07290 at verizon.net
Fri Oct 27 16:05:50 PDT 2006 

Seems like I saw plans on how to build a TV antenna on the internet 
somewhere....  you made it out of about six feet of copper tubing...  Was it 
on SailNet????   Not sure now...

Frank Drahos
Belles & Whistles #98


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <c320-list-request at catalina320.com>
To: <c320-list at catalina320.com>
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 11:00 AM
Subject: C320-List Digest, Vol 153, Issue 1


> Send C320-List mailing list submissions to
> c320-list at catalina320.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://mail.catalina320.com/mailman/listinfo/c320-list_catalina320.com
>
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> c320-list-request at catalina320.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> c320-list-owner at catalina320.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of C320-List digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. TV Antenna (Jerry Clayton)
>   2. More on Genoas (Dave Moores)
>   3. Re: More on Genoas (Peter Clancy)
>   4. Re: More on Genoas (pat reynolds)
>   5. SailBoatStuff - Lifeline Pelican Hook, T-Track, Spinnaker
>      Pole Slide and Rigging hardware (Richard A. Walker)
>   6. Re: 3rd Battery installation (jonvez at comcast.net)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:49:51 -0700
> From: "Jerry Clayton" <jsea at prodigy.net>
> Subject: [C320-list] TV Antenna
> To: "C320-List" <C320-List at catalina320.com>
> Message-ID: <003701c6f91e$c3829d50$9d3a480c at ownerccfbe0136>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Looks like people have had good results with Boatenna.  Thanks to all who 
> replied.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jerry Clayton
> Tropo #988
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:04:58 -0400
> From: "Dave Moores" <dmoores at cogeco.ca>
> Subject: [C320-list] More on Genoas
> To: "c320 at list. Sailnet. Net" <C320-List at catalina320.com>
> Message-ID: <000201c6f920$de264ec0$d2c12418 at pc01>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Questions for the racers - my current genny tacks to the stemhead not the
> drum.  Rationale is deck-sweeper is better, air can't flow under the 
> bottom
> of the sail etc.
>
> Do we believe this?  After all, that bottom foot of the sail is in pretty
> disturbed air anyway, so would I lose much performance by having my new 
> sail
> attach to the drum, not the stem?
>
> And for those who attach to the drum, do you furl or drop when you put the
> spinnaker up?
>
> All important questions!
>
> Dave M
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:29:43 -0400
> From: "Peter Clancy" <SAILORPETE at msn.com>
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] More on Genoas
> To: "C320-List" <c320-list at catalina320.com>, "c320 at list. Sailnet. Net"
> <C320-List at catalina320.com>
> Message-ID: <BAY103-DAV9A92FB5D4E1AA2FD939F2CB070 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> My roller furling mylar 150 is cut with a fairly deep foot. When hauled in 
> tightly it's only about a foot off the deck and still furls easily. A true 
> 'decksweeper' may be of marginal advantage. But, I think you could lose 
> time and flexibility in not being able to quickly furl it in and cleanly 
> hoist the spinnaker in clear air. Ditto when you douse the spinnaker and 
> need to quickly open the headsail. I do know that experienced crews will 
> often hoist or unfurl the 150 to blanket the spinnaker before it's pulled 
> in. Been there, done that, with some picturesque tangles and wraps.
>
> Peter Clancy
> AROBAN C320  #222
> Miami, FL
>
>
> ---- Original Message ----- 
>  From: Dave Moores<mailto:dmoores at cogeco.ca>
>  To: c320 at list. Sailnet. Net<mailto:c320 at list.%20Sailnet.%20Net>
>  Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 1:04 PM
>  Subject: [C320-list] More on Genoas
>
>
>  Questions for the racers - my current genny tacks to the stemhead not the
>  drum.  Rationale is deck-sweeper is better, air can't flow under the 
> bottom
>  of the sail etc.
>
>  Do we believe this?  After all, that bottom foot of the sail is in pretty
>  disturbed air anyway, so would I lose much performance by having my new 
> sail
>  attach to the drum, not the stem?
>
>  And for those who attach to the drum, do you furl or drop when you put 
> the
>  spinnaker up?
>
>  All important questions!
>
>  Dave M
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
> From: pat reynolds <lorasalum at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] More on Genoas
> To: C320-List <c320-list at catalina320.com>
> Message-ID: <20061026194423.80908.qmail at web36503.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> we will normally round upwind mark, raise pole and
> roll up headsail before getting banded spinnaker up.
> We do drop behind genoa however by releasing guy and
> dropping into companionway
>
> --- Peter Clancy <SAILORPETE at msn.com> wrote:
>
>> My roller furling mylar 150 is cut with a fairly
>> deep foot. When hauled in tightly it's only about a
>> foot off the deck and still furls easily. A true
>> 'decksweeper' may be of marginal advantage. But, I
>> think you could lose time and flexibility in not
>> being able to quickly furl it in and cleanly hoist
>> the spinnaker in clear air. Ditto when you douse the
>> spinnaker and need to quickly open the headsail. I
>> do know that experienced crews will often hoist or
>> unfurl the 150 to blanket the spinnaker before it's
>> pulled in. Been there, done that, with some
>> picturesque tangles and wraps.
>>
>> Peter Clancy
>> AROBAN C320  #222
>> Miami, FL
>>
>>
>> ---- Original Message ----- 
>>   From: Dave Moores<mailto:dmoores at cogeco.ca>
>>   To: c320 at list. Sailnet.
>> Net<mailto:c320 at list.%20Sailnet.%20Net>
>>   Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 1:04 PM
>>   Subject: [C320-list] More on Genoas
>>
>>
>>   Questions for the racers - my current genny tacks
>> to the stemhead not the
>>   drum.  Rationale is deck-sweeper is better, air
>> can't flow under the bottom
>>   of the sail etc.
>>
>>   Do we believe this?  After all, that bottom foot
>> of the sail is in pretty
>>   disturbed air anyway, so would I lose much
>> performance by having my new sail
>>   attach to the drum, not the stem?
>>
>>   And for those who attach to the drum, do you furl
>> or drop when you put the
>>   spinnaker up?
>>
>>   All important questions!
>>
>>   Dave M
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:12:23 -0700
> From: "Richard A. Walker" <dickwalker at att.net>
> Subject: [C320-list] SailBoatStuff - Lifeline Pelican Hook, T-Track,
> Spinnaker Pole Slide and Rigging hardware
> To: "'C320-List'" <c320-list at catalina320.com>
> Message-ID: <008201c6f954$321b0b00$5eb3fea9 at D53ZJN31>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> http://www.sailboatstuff.com/dk_rigging.html
>
>
> I had to replace the spring and pin for my pelican hook.  The site above 
> is
> where you can get a replacement kit.
>
> Richard A. Walker
> WindWalker II
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 13:06:58 +0000
> From: jonvez at comcast.net
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] 3rd Battery installation
> To: C320-List <c320-list at catalina320.com>
> Message-ID:
> <102720061306.17237.454204720005E4F1000043552200750438960A90020106 at comcast.net>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Bruce,
>
> In terms of position, there is plenty of room on the starboard side 
> forward of the existing batteries...You may want to consider keeping them 
> close together to maximize storage and minimize wire runs...Good luck...
>
> Regards,
>
> Jon
>
> -------------- Original message -------------- 
> From: "June Bruce" <brucestanley36 at hotmail.com>
>
>> Thanks Jon
>> I have combed the C320 users site and have come up with a lot of info and
>> pictures.
>> The idea of fiberglassing seems the most prudent and I will go in that
>> direction. The position is looking like under the portside bunk.
>> Next week is my start date ... will let you know if I require further 
>> info.
>> Thanks for your offer and reply
>>
>> Bruce Stanley #1084 / Fantastic Lady
>>
>> =====================
>>
>> Jon vez wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006
>> From: jonvez at comcast.net
>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] 3rd Battery Tray installation
>>
>>
>> Hi Bruce,
>>
>> I glassed mine in. Was a very simple and straightforward job--Let me know 
>> if
>> you
>> would like any specific details...
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jon Vez
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Research and compare new cars side by side at carpoint.com.au
>> http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fsecure%2Dau%2Eimrworldwide%2Ecom
>> %2Fcgi%2Dbin%2Fa%2Fci%5F450304%2Fet%5F2%2Fcg%5F801459%2Fpi%5F1004813%2Fai%5F8338
>> 84&_t=54321&_r=hotmail_endtext&_m=EXT
>>
>>
>
> End of C320-List Digest, Vol 153, Issue 1
> *****************************************

More information about the C320-list mailing list