[C320-list] Sound Reducing Paint Reports?

[Orlando.Duran at AveryDennison.com]

Excellent description on the engine soind issue!! :)
----------------------------------
Regards,
OD

Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Seastream [robert.seastream at comcast.net]
Sent: 09/14/2007 03:35 AM
To: C320-List <c320-list at catalina320.com>
Subject: Re: [C320-list] Sound Reducing Paint Reports?

Port list:  If I, or my boat has one, we're not aware of it.

Engine noise:  Orlando is right.  Similar to a wife, slightest change 
in pitch or sound, and you know something's not right!

Bob

On Sep 14, 2007, at 5:21 AM, Allan Field wrote:

> Herb Creech - Please call me re: the keel bolts.  410-746-6532. - Allan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com
> [mailto:c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com] On Behalf Of
> Orlando.Duran at AveryDennison.com
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 10:31 PM
> To: Catalina 320 List
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Sound Reducing Paint Reports?
>
> Herb,
>
> I couldn't agree more. In the 12 years I owned cl 2, with the Perkins, 
> I
> never, ever gave it a second thought.
>
> My opinion has always been that I like listening to the engine 'naked'
> because that way I have a better read on engine performance. As you 
> get used
> to the boat, you have an understanding of the engine is running by 
> getting
> used to the sound (s) it makes.
>
> The slightest change in pitch, sound, I knew something was not right 
> and
> could start the trouble shooting process.
>
> My bitch about my 440 is that the engine is so well insulated and so 
> far
> down in the bilge that I can barely hear it!
> ----------------------------------
> Regards,
> OD
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: hcreech
> Sent: 09/13/2007 07:24 PM
> To: C320-List <c320-list at catalina320.com>
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Sound Reducing Paint Reports?
>
> Over and over I see these comments about noise reduction, I just don't 
> get
> it.  What's the phrase, oh I think it's "get a life."  I have never 
> since I
> have owned this boat ( eight seasons) cared about engine noise.  I 
> love this
> list but just don't get this issue, I think it's a Non!  What an anal 
> issue.
> Why don't we talk instead about port list, or PHRF, or dripless seals, 
> or
> wait a minite I think there is another inane issue.  Sorry, I couldn't 
> help
> it.
> Sincerely,
> Herb Creech
> Cloud Chaser #606
>
>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: Robert Seastream <robert.seastream at comcast.net>
>> My experience is that you need 'dead air' spaces to achieve 
>> insulation,
>> which leads to isolation, particularly in the case of noise.  Paint
>> won't cut it, although it may make the engine cover heavier, resulting
>> in reduced vibration of the cover.
>>
>> I chose the SailorSolutions tiles.  While they don't provide the 'up 
>> to
>> 90 percent' noise reduction ('up to' is the disclaimer), my wife
>> (unbiased witness) says that the engine noise has decreased to near
>> half what it was.  I just know it's quieter.  I might have saved money
>> by  purchasing similar tile backed foam insulation at reduced price
>> elsewhere, but didn't see anything similar at Home Desperate or Lowser
>> that qualified.  Hey, it's a diesel.  I'd like to witness these 
>> quieter
>> Perkins that I've heard about.
>>
>> Bob Seastream
>> 'Intuition' hull 906
>>
>>
>> On Sep 13, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Henry LeSieur wrote:
>>
>>> I used the SR1000 paint and I am disappointed in the results. I can't
>>> really make any distinction in noise levels before and after
>>> application.
>>>
>>>   Hank
>>>   #331
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Sincerely,
> Herb Creech
> Cloud Chaser #606
>
>
> - -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity 
> to
> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
> taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
> entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you 
> received
> this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from 
> any
> computer.
>
>
>



- -----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.