[C320-list] Dodger and Bimini Rub

Pat Moriarty patm at psiurethanes.com
Tue Jan 19 06:00:55 PST 2010


Also with age the sail will shorten on the luff and lengthen on the 
leech, because the luff rope shrinks and the sail material stretches. 
All this adds up to the boom getting lower over time. Do you tighten 
your main halyard after sailing a little while to take out the stretch?


Pat #130

At 07:54 AM 1/19/2010, you wrote:
>I'm wondering how tight is the leach when the boom and blocks are 
>interfering with the biminy and dodger. With the vang and sheets off 
>is it possible to raise the sail higher?
>Bruce
>Somerset 671 SoCal
>Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Scott Thompson <surprise at thompson87.com>
>Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 08:15:15
>To: <C320-List at Catalina320.com>
>Subject: Re: [C320-list] Dodger and Bimini Rub
>
>None of the choices are very good.
>
>1.  Raising the lower blocks can't change the angle much unless you
>raise the blocks a lot, and the shackles that you use to raise the block
>would have to be very strong.  You also risk having a lot of metal
>banging around during jibes.
>
>2.  Rebuilding the dodger is expensive but does not involve any
>re-engineering of the highly loaded boom system.  You might end up with
>not enough room to swing a winch handle on the halyard winches, which is
>the situation on my boat.  And to the extent that you change the angle
>to the aft block it will be by reducing the turn angle at that block,
>which will in turn require more mainsheet load for a given amount of
>downward force on the boom.
>
>3.  Moving the aft block on the boom has potential negative effects on
>structural integrity:  It reduces mechanical advantage a little
>requiring slightly more mainsheet tension.  More importantly, it
>involves having additional holes in a very highly loaded part of the
>boom, possibly leading to stress fractures and failure.  And by moving
>the boom blocks closer together it will further concentrate the stress
>on the boom, which already is pretty concentrated given our mid-boom
>sheeting arrangement.  I would consult a rigger before doing this.  I
>assume you will want stainless rivets, and will need to take proper
>precautions against galvanic corrosion where these are mounted in the
>aluminum boom.
>
>4.  A new traveller in the same location can't change things much.  I
>wouldn't go down this route unless you are certain that the traveller
>will be enough further forward of the existing one to solve the problem.
>
>5.  Are you absolutely certain that the problem is not due to the way
>you are sailing the boat?  You might want to post a picture showing the
>setup of mainsheet and traveller in a situation where you are having the
>problem.  Have you considered adjusting the traveller / mainsheet / vang
>combination in order to see if you can make the problem go away?  You
>might move the traveller a bit more to weather or a bit less to weather
>and/or adjust mainsheet and vang tension, for example, to change the
>angle of the sheet as it rises to the boom.  If the sheet is essentially
>straight up and down when the problem occurs I would try easing the
>sheet and moving the traveller further to weather, for example.
>
>There are a lot of 320's on the Chesapeake.  I suggest you take careful
>measurements of your boat and then find other owners to compare notes.
>Make sure it's the boat and not the way you are sailing it before you
>change anything.  Apologies in advance if you've done this already.
>
>Scott
>
>
>Stephen Cox wrote:
> > There is a fourth option, install the new Garhauer Traveller that 
> comes with
> > the MK II.  I have a MK II with factory dodger and there is no rubbing of
> > the main sheet blocks.
> >
> > Stephen Cox
> > Tegwen #1141
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >>
> >> Hey Everyone,
> >>
> >> I have queried the group in the past about the factory canvas
> >> on the later model 320s (2000s w / factory canvas).  To
> >> refresh, the main sheet is angled such that is rubs the top
> >> front of the dodger.  The boom also rubs the top of the
> >> bimini however that is less of the problem.
> >>
> >> I had proposed two solutions, and now have three.
> >>
> >>   1.. Move the main sheet blocks up higher (off the traveler)
> >> to cut down the angle.
> >>   2.. Have the dodger lowered (front tube only) and have the
> >> canvas re-cut.
> >>   3.. Move the bale forward on the boom. (1 inch would
> >> probably do it...) I went to visit APS (Annapolis Performance
> >> Sailing) and they highly recommended against 1 and suggested 3.
> >>
> >> Has anyone moved their bale forward on their 320 and if so:
> >>
> >>   a.. Was it difficult to do if they did it themselves?
> >> (involves drilling rivets, drilling new holes and re-riveting.)
> >>   b.. Is there any engineering concerns?
> >> I know that some Hunters are rigged the same way and have the
> >> bale even more forward than the Cat 320.
> >>
> >> Any thoughts on this?  Thanks in advance!
> >>
> >> -Brad, Mary, Monica, and Jarod
> >> "Independence"
> >> 2004 Catalina 320 Hull 1006
> >> Middle River, MD
> >
>
>--
>Scott Thompson
>Surprise, #653

Pat Moriarty
PSI Urethanes Inc
PH: 800-888-5156  Fax: 512-837-8733
Please visit our web site at
www.psiurethanes.com





More information about the C320-list mailing list