[C320-list] C320-list Digest, Vol 882, Issue 1

hcreech at comcast.net hcreech at comcast.net
Wed Sep 1 13:11:18 PDT 2010


Hey List, just an observation, but most of the hull numbers I have seen mentioning this problem have been newer boats. My boat, hull 606, is a 1999 model. Once I learned, from the list, to use fresh water instead of pumping bay water there has been no odors on my boat, you can ask my wife. As long as I take care of the bilge the boat smells like a boat, but no offensive odors. I am assuming the locker everyone is mentioning is beneath the head sink, if so no odors from there, in fact none from anywhere on the boat. We do pump out on a regular basis, but sometimes it sits, so I was a little surprised to hear this complaint. Maybe someone should tally the hull numbers and see, if like the shallow bilge problem, it is related to a certain vintage boat. 
Sorry some are having this problem. 



Herb Creech 
Cloud Chaser #606 



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "michael nagelkirk" <mikenagelkirk at gmail.com> 
To: c320-list at lists.catalina320.com 
Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2010 3:43:48 PM 
Subject: Re: [C320-list] C320-list Digest, Vol 882, Issue 1 

My goodness Sean, Fred and all the rest of us dealing with the odor issue. I 
had no idea that it was almost universal. To think of the time and money 
required just to get as little as 20% of the odor out and not even be able 
to use your locker or the full potential of your head for that matter is 
appalling. I think we should collectively take this up with Catalina 
directly and have its experts solve the problem and possibly even contribute 
to the remedy. 

*Mike NagelkirkMikeNagelkirk* 
True North #909 



On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:00 PM, <c320-list-request at lists.catalina320.com>wrote: 

> Send C320-list mailing list submissions to 
> c320-list at lists.catalina320.com 
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit 
> http://lists.catalina320.com/listinfo.cgi/c320-list-catalina320.com 
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to 
> c320-list-request at lists.catalina320.com 
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at 
> c320-list-owner at lists.catalina320.com 
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific 
> than "Re: Contents of C320-list digest..." 
> 
> 
> Today's Topics: 
> 
> 1. Re: eliminating odor (Sean Kaldor) 
> 2. Re: eliminating odor (Fred LEcuyer) 
> 3. Cockpit shower wand (Irving Grunes) 
> 4. muffler and electrical excitment (pat reynolds) 
> 5. Re: Cockpit shower wand (hcreech at comcast.net) 
> 6. Re: Cockpit shower wand (Irving Grunes) 
> 7. Re: Cockpit shower wand (hcreech at comcast.net) 
> 8. Re: Cockpit shower wand (Scott Thompson) 
> 9. Hurricane Earl (Robert Seastream) 
> 10. Re: Hurricane Earl (ericstillwellevans at gmail.com) 
> 11. Re: Hurricane Earl (jim brown) 
> 12. Re: Hurricane Earl (=?utf-8?B?YXJnYXRlczJuZEBjb21jYXN0Lm5ldA==?=) 
> 13. Re: Hurricane Earl (Kurt Budelmann) 
> 14. Re: Hurricane Earl (Jeff Hare) 
> 15. Re: muffler and electrical excitment (chester carson) 
> 16. Re: muffler and electrical excitment (pat reynolds) 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> 
> Message: 1 
> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:20:11 -0700 (PDT) 
> From: Sean Kaldor <spkaldor at yahoo.com> 
> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] eliminating odor 
> Message-ID: <697913.24018.qm at web50204.mail.re2.yahoo.com> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 
> 
> We've also had a problem with odor on our 1998 #499. 
> 
> Prior Owner used rarely. Noticed the smell in the locker and in the 
> compartment 
> under the sink upon purchase. 
> 
> Took the following action: 
> 
> (1) Replaced the entire head; 
> (2) Replaced all hoses to/from the head (raw water intake, pumpout) as well 
> as 
> sink drain hose; 
> (3) Replaced the main vent hose; 
> (4) Replaced the hose from the head to the holding tank; 
> (5) Removed all wood from the locker, sprayed locker and 
> compartment?repeatedly 
> with pet odor 'natures miracle' remover; 
> (6) Cleaned entire head compartment with bleach/water; 
> (7) Have used fresh water flush since we purchased the boat, and no solid 
> waste; 
> (8) Cleaned the thru-hull vent; 
> 
> Four?months later, I would say the odor is about 20% improved. 
> 
> The only other steps I can think of would be: 
> (1) Replace the holding tank; 
> (2) Replace hoses to macerator, and the macerator; 
> (3) Scrub area under the holding tank with bleach/water and odor remover; 
> 
> But I have no idea if that will really fix the problem. At this point, we 
> don't 
> store anything in the locker and are happy the smell doesn't go any further 
> than 
> that. 
> 
> Sean 
> Libert? #499 
> San Francisco 
> 
> ------------------------------ 
> 
> Message: 2 
> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:35:34 -0400 
> From: Fred LEcuyer <fred.lecuyer at live.com> 
> To: Catalina320list Catalina320list <c320-list at catalina320.com> 
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] eliminating odor 
> Message-ID: <SNT113-W37399B1320F4AABC876DDE98A0 at phx.gbl> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" 
> 
> 
> Sean: 
> 
> Our biggest improvement seemed to come when I re-tefloned the fittings to 
> the tank and removed the tank to scrub underneath. 
> 
> Someone further down the E-mail chain suggest that backpressure from 
> accidently hitting the macerator switch may have caused leakage at the 
> fittings. That makes sense to me and it's nearly impossible to tell what's 
> under the tank until you pull it. 
> 
> Fred 
> 
> > Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:20:11 -0700 
> > From: spkaldor at yahoo.com 
> > To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
> > Subject: Re: [C320-list] eliminating odor 
> > 
> > We've also had a problem with odor on our 1998 #499. 
> > 
> > Prior Owner used rarely. Noticed the smell in the locker and in the 
> compartment 
> > under the sink upon purchase. 
> > 
> > Took the following action: 
> > 
> > (1) Replaced the entire head; 
> > (2) Replaced all hoses to/from the head (raw water intake, pumpout) as 
> well as 
> > sink drain hose; 
> > (3) Replaced the main vent hose; 
> > (4) Replaced the hose from the head to the holding tank; 
> > (5) Removed all wood from the locker, sprayed locker and compartment 
> repeatedly 
> > with pet odor 'natures miracle' remover; 
> > (6) Cleaned entire head compartment with bleach/water; 
> > (7) Have used fresh water flush since we purchased the boat, and no solid 
> waste; 
> > (8) Cleaned the thru-hull vent; 
> > 
> > Four months later, I would say the odor is about 20% improved. 
> > 
> > The only other steps I can think of would be: 
> > (1) Replace the holding tank; 
> > (2) Replace hoses to macerator, and the macerator; 
> > (3) Scrub area under the holding tank with bleach/water and odor remover; 
> > 
> > But I have no idea if that will really fix the problem. At this point, we 
> don't 
> > store anything in the locker and are happy the smell doesn't go any 
> further than 
> > that. 
> > 
> > Sean 
> > Libert? #499 
> > San Francisco 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------ 
> 
> Message: 3 
> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 18:00:00 -0400 
> From: Irving Grunes <igrunes at gmail.com> 
> To: C320-List <C320-list at catalina320.org> 
> Subject: [C320-list] Cockpit shower wand 
> Message-ID: 
> <AANLkTimr4vwxdBEF6CBXT1omhq6ftVM0Wn9GQGGNRjt- at mail.gmail.com> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 
> 
> Where to buy replacement shower wand and hose 
> Irv grunes 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------ 
> 
> Message: 4 
> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:10:55 -0700 (PDT) 
> From: pat reynolds <lorasalum at yahoo.com> 
> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
> Subject: [C320-list] muffler and electrical excitment 
> Message-ID: <268590.93779.qm at web36503.mail.mud.yahoo.com> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii 
> 
> As a religious follower of the wisdom imparted on this site since its' 
> inception, I have been fortunate to have avoided many of the problems cited, 
> ie; head odors (freshwater boat), charger problems, corrosion etc. In the 
> 15 years we have owned the boat I have only had the muffler and the 
> electrical fuel pump replaced. ( I know, I just opened pandora's box). I do 
> have a water under the liner problem which I have been meaning to address 
> for several of those 15 years (again freshwater only). I think fortunately 
> however that that problem may have saved the boat. 
> 
> On a recent single handed return from a long distance race on Lake Michigan 
> (blessed freshwater) I was awaken at anchor at 3 am by the bilge pump 
> cycling. It seems that the year old replacement muffler I had gotten from 
> Catalina had developed two leaks in the bottom (worse than the 14 year old 
> one I replaced) and motoring that day had filled the bilges and assorted 
> pockets. Tired and grumbling since I was still 100 miles from home, I 
> removed the floor boards and hand pumped for a couple of hours. Some of the 
> water remained, as always, under the liner. 
> 
> I had the muffler reglassed at the next port and continued on. Two nights 
> later while in a slip, again at 4 am during a bad electrical storm, I 
> smelled something burning. I had a fan running off the shore power and 
> thought it had overheated but it was cool. I turned on the cabin lights 
> which run off the batteries and noticed a faint wisp of smoke coming from 
> behind the electrical panel. It was heavier when I opened the panel. 
> Opening the battery compartment I could see that the charger wire 
> insulation had burned completely off and these wires had fused onto and 
> burned the battery cables. These wires run under the liner through conduit 
> from the starboard to the port side. Apparently a power surge at the marina 
> had come in thru the shore power cord, burned out the charger and started 
> the electrical fire. When they pulled the wiring and conduit out I could 
> see that the conduit (pvc pipe) was burned completely thru under the liner. 
> I am thinking 
> that maybe the water underneath had helped keep the fire from spreading. 
> Except for all of the wiring, charger and battery switch all else was ok. 
> 
> The electrician did not reconnect the charger wires directly to the 
> battery, but to the battery switch with fuses. He said that would alleviate 
> some of the wiring running underneath the liner. He also said that the 
> reason that the charger breaker did not pop was because the charge went thru 
> the negative side seeking ground. 
> 
> This was just a long way of saying that we should be aware of the wiring 
> which is run thru and under the liner from the engine, charger, panel etc. 
> In additon to being inaccessible it may also be subject to chafe and 
> fraying. If I am ever on the boat again during an electrical storm I will 
> immediately remove the shore power cord. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------ 
> 
> Message: 5 
> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 00:43:47 +0000 (UTC) 
> From: hcreech at comcast.net 
> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Cockpit shower wand 
> Message-ID: 
> < 
> 1793164456.820936.1283301827848.JavaMail.root at sz0074a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net 
> > 
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 
> 
> Real easy, Home Depot or Lowes, it's a standard replacement item. That is 
> where I bought mine. 
> 
> 
> Herb Creech 
> Cloud Chaser #606 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Irving Grunes" <igrunes at gmail.com> 
> To: "C320-List" <C320-list at catalina320.org> 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 6:00:00 PM 
> Subject: [C320-list] Cockpit shower wand 
> 
> Where to buy replacement shower wand and hose 
> Irv grunes 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------ 
> 
> Message: 6 
> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:49:07 -0400 
> From: Irving Grunes <igrunes at gmail.com> 
> To: C320-List at catalina320.com 
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Cockpit shower wand 
> Message-ID: 
> <AANLkTikz4Ju1H9wbYo_YRyW7nXMHHVxa0LysYLmnj73w at mail.gmail.com> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 
> 
> Sorry, I meant cockpit shower wand. 
> Irv 
> #851 
> 
> On Aug 31, 2010 8:43 PM, <hcreech at comcast.net> wrote: 
> Real easy, Home Depot or Lowes, it's a standard replacement item. That is 
> where I bought mine. 
> 
> 
> Herb Creech 
> Cloud Chaser #606 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Irving Grunes" <igrunes at gmail.com> 
> To: "C320-List" <C320-li... 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------ 
> 
> Message: 7 
> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 01:55:14 +0000 (UTC) 
> From: hcreech at comcast.net 
> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Cockpit shower wand 
> Message-ID: 
> < 
> 405149512.824953.1283306114833.JavaMail.root at sz0074a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net 
> > 
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 
> 
> That was what I was talking about, read it right the first time. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Herb 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Irving Grunes" <igrunes at gmail.com> 
> To: C320-List at catalina320.com 
> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 8:49:07 PM 
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Cockpit shower wand 
> 
> Sorry, I meant cockpit shower wand. 
> Irv 
> #851 
> 
> On Aug 31, 2010 8:43 PM, <hcreech at comcast.net> wrote: 
> Real easy, Home Depot or Lowes, it's a standard replacement item. That is 
> where I bought mine. 
> 
> 
> Herb Creech 
> Cloud Chaser #606 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Irving Grunes" <igrunes at gmail.com> 
> To: "C320-List" <C320-li... 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------ 
> 
> Message: 8 
> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:29:26 -0400 
> From: Scott Thompson <surprise at thompson87.com> 
> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Cockpit shower wand 
> Message-ID: <4C7E3916.8040401 at thompson87.com> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed 
> 
> These are manufactured by SSI Custom Plastics in Hollywood, Maryland. 
> They were very helpful when I called them to get a replacement a few 
> years back. 
> 
> See http://www.ssicustomplastics.com/ 
> 
> -- 
> Scott Thompson 
> Surprise, #653 
> 
> 
> Irving Grunes wrote: 
> > Where to buy replacement shower wand and hose 
> > Irv grunes 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------ 
> 
> Message: 9 
> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 07:47:10 -0400 
> From: Robert Seastream <robert.seastream at comcast.net> 
> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
> Subject: [C320-list] Hurricane Earl 
> Message-ID: <C517D7D0-582E-400F-85B0-7F144AED46EA at comcast.net> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes 
> 
> All: 
> 
> Not to unduly excite everyone, but in the event of a direct hit 
> (doubtful the case here) where do you feel your boat would be safer: 
> in a slip, on a mooring, or out of the water? 
> I lean towards on a mooring because there's less 'things' to fly about 
> and hit the boat. On land she'd be on jackstands; more likely lying 
> next to them after the storm passed. 
> 
> Bob Seastream 
> Intuition # 906 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------ 
> 
> Message: 10 
> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 12:00:15 +0000 
> From: ericstillwellevans at gmail.com 
> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Hurricane Earl 
> Message-ID: 
> 
> <1158712043-1283342415-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-275800562- at bda2817.bisx.prod.on.blackberry 
> > 
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain 
> 
> I used to feel the same way until a Squall traveling 40mph with 85mph winds 
> lasting only 10min dragged my boat and others and caused damage. 
> 
> I would think with the storm surge related to hurricanes a mooring may be 
> fine but I would extend your mooring lines. 
> 
> Rick 
> 724 
> ------Original Message------ 
> From: Robert Seastream 
> Sender: c320-list-bounces at lists.catalina320.com 
> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
> ReplyTo: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
> Subject: [C320-list] Hurricane Earl 
> Sent: Sep 1, 2010 7:47 AM 
> 
> All: 
> 
> Not to unduly excite everyone, but in the event of a direct hit 
> (doubtful the case here) where do you feel your boat would be safer: 
> in a slip, on a mooring, or out of the water? 
> I lean towards on a mooring because there's less 'things' to fly about 
> and hit the boat. On land she'd be on jackstands; more likely lying 
> next to them after the storm passed. 
> 
> Bob Seastream 
> Intuition # 906 
> 
> 
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------ 
> 
> Message: 11 
> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 05:01:55 -0700 (PDT) 
> From: jim brown <jbrown5093 at yahoo.com> 
> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Hurricane Earl 
> Message-ID: <732454.82453.qm at web58604.mail.re3.yahoo.com> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 
> 
> BoatUS has a whole section on hurricane preparation from the safest place 
> to be to what kind of lines-not nylon- to use to what chafing gear is best 
> etc Very helpful 
> 
> --- On Wed, 9/1/10, Robert Seastream <robert.seastream at comcast.net> wrote: 
> 
> From: Robert Seastream <robert.seastream at comcast.net> 
> Subject: [C320-list] Hurricane Earl 
> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
> Date: Wednesday, September 1, 2010, 7:47 AM 
> 
> All: 
> 
> Not to unduly excite everyone, but in the event of a direct hit (doubtful 
> the case here) where do you feel your boat would be safer:? in a slip, on a 
> mooring, or out of the water? 
> I lean towards on a mooring because there's less 'things' to fly about and 
> hit the boat.? On land she'd be on jackstands; more likely lying next to 
> them after the storm passed. 
> 
> Bob Seastream 
> Intuition # 906 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------ 
> 
> Message: 12 
> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:04:23 -0400 
> From: "=?utf-8?B?YXJnYXRlczJuZEBjb21jYXN0Lm5ldA==?=" 
> <argates2nd at comcast.net> 
> To: "=?utf-8?B?Um9iZXJ0IFNlYXN0cmVhbQ==?=" 
> <robert.seastream at comcast.net>, C320-List at Catalina320.com 
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Hurricane Earl 
> Message-ID: <20100901120417.B6650448230 at homiemail-mx2.g.dreamhost.com> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 
> 
> Ins req'ts? 
> 
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone 
> 
> ----- Reply message ----- 
> From: "Robert Seastream" <robert.seastream at comcast.net> 
> Date: Wed, Sep 1, 2010 7:47 am 
> Subject: [C320-list] Hurricane Earl 
> To: <C320-List at Catalina320.com> 
> 
> All: 
> 
> Not to unduly excite everyone, but in the event of a direct hit (doubtful 
> the case here) where do you feel your boat would be safer: in a slip, on a 
> mooring, or out of the water? 
> I lean towards on a mooring because there's less 'things' to fly about and 
> hit the boat. On land she'd be on jackstands; more likely lying next to 
> them after the storm passed. 
> 
> Bob Seastream 
> Intuition # 906 
> 
> ------------------------------ 
> 
> Message: 13 
> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 08:37:18 -0400 
> From: "Kurt Budelmann" <krbmd77 at charter.net> 
> To: <C320-List at Catalina320.com> 
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Hurricane Earl 
> Message-ID: <F14A55A0B8894971891B266CC66DAA25 at lchcs.org> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; 
> reply-type=response 
> 
> Seaworthy, the Boat US magazine showed that the best preparation was on 
> land 
> with jackstands and guide wires preventing the boat from moving. I think 
> they had 4 to 6 guide wires anchored in the ground around the boat. Also, 
> their insurance will offset the cost. 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Robert Seastream" <robert.seastream at comcast.net> 
> To: <C320-List at Catalina320.com> 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 7:47 AM 
> Subject: [C320-list] Hurricane Earl 
> 
> 
> > All: 
> > 
> > Not to unduly excite everyone, but in the event of a direct hit 
> (doubtful 
> > the case here) where do you feel your boat would be safer: in a slip, 
> on 
> > a mooring, or out of the water? 
> > I lean towards on a mooring because there's less 'things' to fly about 
> > and hit the boat. On land she'd be on jackstands; more likely lying 
> next 
> > to them after the storm passed. 
> > 
> > Bob Seastream 
> > Intuition # 906 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------ 
> 
> Message: 14 
> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 12:38:56 +0000 
> From: "Jeff Hare" <catalina at thehares.com> 
> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Hurricane Earl 
> Message-ID: 
> 
> <255742206-1283344729-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-419593409- at bda284.bisx.prod.on.blackberry 
> > 
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain 
> 
> In our area Bob, land is the best option as yards around here are used to 
> blocking boats on stands for high winds. Maybe 100 mph winds would require 
> some staked lines or tied off on trees. I know my boat with cover has done 
> fine in 70mph on land. Ins companies will often pay for haulout if a storm 
> is imminent and damage is likely. 
> 
> I would say moorings next assuming the mooring block and tackle is solid. 
> 
> Docks are the worst because the boat will get pounded a lot and can't face 
> the wind. 
> 
> Take your canvas down, center the boom and tie off the aft end to both 
> stern cleats. Secure all loose lines and lead halyards where they won't 
> chaffe on the spreaders. 
> 
> -Jeff 
> 
> ------Original Message------ 
> From: Robert Seastream 
> Sender: c320-list-bounces at lists.catalina320.com 
> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
> ReplyTo: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
> Subject: [C320-list] Hurricane Earl 
> Sent: Sep 1, 2010 7:47 AM 
> 
> All: 
> 
> Not to unduly excite everyone, but in the event of a direct hit 
> (doubtful the case here) where do you feel your boat would be safer: 
> in a slip, on a mooring, or out of the water? 
> I lean towards on a mooring because there's less 'things' to fly about 
> and hit the boat. On land she'd be on jackstands; more likely lying 
> next to them after the storm passed. 
> 
> Bob Seastream 
> Intuition # 906 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------ 
> 
> Message: 15 
> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 10:07:45 -0500 
> From: chester carson <cmkit10 at gmail.com> 
> To: C320-List at catalina320.com 
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] muffler and electrical excitment 
> Message-ID: 
> <AANLkTimJm2YoBp05rCzKkLKsTonCSdZ4-GGBk+2m9=Gd at mail.gmail.com> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 
> 
> Pat 
> that is similar to the fire I had and the catalina solution is to fuse the 
> battery charger wires at the battery. They have a diagram with specs that 
> they can send you. I believe that ABYC now requires this on new boats. 
> Kit Carson 
> #223 
> 
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:10 PM, pat reynolds <lorasalum at yahoo.com> wrote: 
> 
> > As a religious follower of the wisdom imparted on this site since its' 
> > inception, I have been fortunate to have avoided many of the problems 
> cited, 
> > ie; head odors (freshwater boat), charger problems, corrosion etc. In 
> the 
> > 15 years we have owned the boat I have only had the muffler and the 
> > electrical fuel pump replaced. ( I know, I just opened pandora's box). I 
> do 
> > have a water under the liner problem which I have been meaning to address 
> > for several of those 15 years (again freshwater only). I think 
> fortunately 
> > however that that problem may have saved the boat. 
> > 
> > On a recent single handed return from a long distance race on Lake 
> Michigan 
> > (blessed freshwater) I was awaken at anchor at 3 am by the bilge pump 
> > cycling. It seems that the year old replacement muffler I had gotten 
> from 
> > Catalina had developed two leaks in the bottom (worse than the 14 year 
> old 
> > one I replaced) and motoring that day had filled the bilges and assorted 
> > pockets. Tired and grumbling since I was still 100 miles from home, I 
> > removed the floor boards and hand pumped for a couple of hours. Some of 
> the 
> > water remained, as always, under the liner. 
> > 
> > I had the muffler reglassed at the next port and continued on. Two 
> nights 
> > later while in a slip, again at 4 am during a bad electrical storm, I 
> > smelled something burning. I had a fan running off the shore power and 
> > thought it had overheated but it was cool. I turned on the cabin lights 
> > which run off the batteries and noticed a faint wisp of smoke coming from 
> > behind the electrical panel. It was heavier when I opened the panel. 
> > Opening the battery compartment I could see that the charger wire 
> > insulation had burned completely off and these wires had fused onto and 
> > burned the battery cables. These wires run under the liner through 
> conduit 
> > from the starboard to the port side. Apparently a power surge at the 
> marina 
> > had come in thru the shore power cord, burned out the charger and started 
> > the electrical fire. When they pulled the wiring and conduit out I could 
> > see that the conduit (pvc pipe) was burned completely thru under the 
> liner. 
> > I am thinking 
> > that maybe the water underneath had helped keep the fire from spreading. 
> > Except for all of the wiring, charger and battery switch all else was 
> ok. 
> > 
> > The electrician did not reconnect the charger wires directly to the 
> > battery, but to the battery switch with fuses. He said that would 
> alleviate 
> > some of the wiring running underneath the liner. He also said that the 
> > reason that the charger breaker did not pop was because the charge went 
> thru 
> > the negative side seeking ground. 
> > 
> > This was just a long way of saying that we should be aware of the wiring 
> > which is run thru and under the liner from the engine, charger, panel 
> etc. 
> > In additon to being inaccessible it may also be subject to chafe and 
> > fraying. If I am ever on the boat again during an electrical storm I 
> will 
> > immediately remove the shore power cord. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------ 
> 
> Message: 16 
> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 08:57:34 -0700 (PDT) 
> From: pat reynolds <lorasalum at yahoo.com> 
> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] muffler and electrical excitment 
> Message-ID: <118319.86321.qm at web36503.mail.mud.yahoo.com> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 
> 
> Thanks Kit I think that is what the electrician told me about the 
> standards when he put the fuses on the wires at the batt switch. I know 
> less about this field than I do computers so I forgot to ask him if this 
> affected the way the batteries are charged on shore power, ie both charged 
> no matter what position the switch is on. 
> 
> Pat 
> 
> --- On Wed, 9/1/10, chester carson <cmkit10 at gmail.com> wrote: 
> 
> > From: chester carson <cmkit10 at gmail.com> 
> > Subject: Re: [C320-list] muffler and electrical excitment 
> > To: C320-List at catalina320.com 
> > Date: Wednesday, September 1, 2010, 10:07 AM 
> > Pat 
> > that is similar to the fire I had and the catalina solution 
> > is to fuse the 
> > battery charger wires at the battery. They have a diagram 
> > with specs that 
> > they can send you. I believe that ABYC now requires this on 
> > new boats. 
> > Kit Carson 
> > #223 
> > 
> > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:10 PM, pat reynolds <lorasalum at yahoo.com> 
> > wrote: 
> > 
> > > As a religious follower of the wisdom imparted on this 
> > site since its' 
> > > inception, I have been fortunate to have avoided many 
> > of the problems cited, 
> > > ie; head odors (freshwater boat), charger problems, 
> > corrosion etc.? In the 
> > > 15 years we have owned the boat I have only had the 
> > muffler and the 
> > > electrical fuel pump replaced. ( I know, I just opened 
> > pandora's box).? I do 
> > > have a water under the liner problem which I have been 
> > meaning to address 
> > > for several of those 15 years (again freshwater 
> > only).? I think fortunately 
> > > however that that problem may have saved the boat. 
> > > 
> > > On a recent single handed return from a long distance 
> > race on Lake Michigan 
> > > (blessed freshwater) I was awaken at anchor at? 3 
> > am by the bilge pump 
> > > cycling.? It seems that the year old replacement 
> > muffler I had gotten from 
> > > Catalina had developed two leaks in the bottom (worse 
> > than the 14 year old 
> > > one I replaced) and motoring that day had filled the 
> > bilges and assorted 
> > > pockets.? Tired and grumbling since I was still 
> > 100 miles from home, I 
> > > removed the floor boards and hand pumped for a couple 
> > of hours.? Some of the 
> > > water remained, as always, under the liner. 
> > > 
> > > I had the muffler reglassed at the next port and 
> > continued on.? Two nights 
> > > later while in a slip, again at 4 am during a bad 
> > electrical storm, I 
> > > smelled something burning.? I had a fan running 
> > off the shore power and 
> > > thought it had overheated but it was cool.? I 
> > turned on the cabin lights 
> > > which run off the batteries and noticed a faint wisp 
> > of smoke coming from 
> > > behind the electrical panel.? It was heavier when 
> > I opened the panel. 
> > >? Opening the battery compartment I could see that 
> > the charger wire 
> > > insulation had burned completely off and these wires 
> > had fused onto and 
> > > burned the battery cables.? These wires run under 
> > the liner through conduit 
> > > from the starboard to the port side.? Apparently 
> > a power surge at the marina 
> > > had come in thru the shore power cord, burned out the 
> > charger and started 
> > > the electrical fire.? When they pulled the wiring 
> > and conduit out I could 
> > > see that the conduit (pvc pipe) was burned completely 
> > thru under the liner. 
> > >? I am thinking 
> > >? that maybe the water underneath had helped keep 
> > the fire from spreading. 
> > >? Except for all of the wiring, charger and 
> > battery switch all else was ok. 
> > > 
> > > The electrician did not reconnect the charger wires 
> > directly to the 
> > > battery, but to the battery switch with fuses.? 
> > He said that would alleviate 
> > > some of the wiring running underneath the liner.? 
> > He also said that the 
> > > reason that the charger breaker did not pop was 
> > because the charge went thru 
> > > the negative side seeking ground. 
> > > 
> > > This was just a long way of saying that we should be 
> > aware of the wiring 
> > > which is run thru and under the liner from the engine, 
> > charger, panel etc. 
> > >? In additon to being inaccessible it may also be 
> > subject to chafe and 
> > > fraying.???If I am ever on the boat 
> > again during an electrical storm I will 
> > > immediately remove the shore power cord. 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> End of C320-list Digest, Vol 882, Issue 1 
> ***************************************** 
> 



More information about the C320-list mailing list