[C320-list] C320-list Digest, Vol 882, Issue 1

Scott Thompson surprise at thompson87.com
Thu Sep 2 04:53:29 PDT 2010


Ditto on my 1999 boat, and we even use Chesapeake Bay water to flush 
most of the time.  (I usually do a last flush with fresh before leaving 
the boat, however.)  I do not recall it to be an issue on older 320s 
when we went shopping in 2003.

Scott Thompson
Surprise, 653

hcreech at comcast.net wrote:
> Hey List, just an observation, but most of the hull numbers I have seen mentioning this problem have been newer boats. My boat, hull 606, is a 1999 model. Once I learned, from the list, to use fresh water instead of pumping bay water there has been no odors on my boat, you can ask my wife. As long as I take care of the bilge the boat smells like a boat, but no offensive odors. I am assuming the locker everyone is mentioning is beneath the head sink, if so no odors from there, in fact none from anywhere on the boat. We do pump out on a regular basis, but sometimes it sits, so I was a little surprised to hear this complaint. Maybe someone should tally the hull numbers and see, if like the shallow bilge problem, it is related to a certain vintage boat. 
> Sorry some are having this problem. 
> 
> 
> 
> Herb Creech 
> Cloud Chaser #606 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "michael nagelkirk" <mikenagelkirk at gmail.com> 
> To: c320-list at lists.catalina320.com 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2010 3:43:48 PM 
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] C320-list Digest, Vol 882, Issue 1 
> 
> My goodness Sean, Fred and all the rest of us dealing with the odor issue. I 
> had no idea that it was almost universal. To think of the time and money 
> required just to get as little as 20% of the odor out and not even be able 
> to use your locker or the full potential of your head for that matter is 
> appalling. I think we should collectively take this up with Catalina 
> directly and have its experts solve the problem and possibly even contribute 
> to the remedy. 
> 
> *Mike NagelkirkMikeNagelkirk* 
> True North #909 
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:00 PM, <c320-list-request at lists.catalina320.com>wrote: 
> 
>> Send C320-list mailing list submissions to 
>> c320-list at lists.catalina320.com 
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit 
>> http://lists.catalina320.com/listinfo.cgi/c320-list-catalina320.com 
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to 
>> c320-list-request at lists.catalina320.com 
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at 
>> c320-list-owner at lists.catalina320.com 
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific 
>> than "Re: Contents of C320-list digest..." 
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics: 
>>
>> 1. Re: eliminating odor (Sean Kaldor) 
>> 2. Re: eliminating odor (Fred LEcuyer) 
>> 3. Cockpit shower wand (Irving Grunes) 
>> 4. muffler and electrical excitment (pat reynolds) 
>> 5. Re: Cockpit shower wand (hcreech at comcast.net) 
>> 6. Re: Cockpit shower wand (Irving Grunes) 
>> 7. Re: Cockpit shower wand (hcreech at comcast.net) 
>> 8. Re: Cockpit shower wand (Scott Thompson) 
>> 9. Hurricane Earl (Robert Seastream) 
>> 10. Re: Hurricane Earl (ericstillwellevans at gmail.com) 
>> 11. Re: Hurricane Earl (jim brown) 
>> 12. Re: Hurricane Earl (=?utf-8?B?YXJnYXRlczJuZEBjb21jYXN0Lm5ldA==?=) 
>> 13. Re: Hurricane Earl (Kurt Budelmann) 
>> 14. Re: Hurricane Earl (Jeff Hare) 
>> 15. Re: muffler and electrical excitment (chester carson) 
>> 16. Re: muffler and electrical excitment (pat reynolds) 
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>
>> Message: 1 
>> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:20:11 -0700 (PDT) 
>> From: Sean Kaldor <spkaldor at yahoo.com> 
>> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] eliminating odor 
>> Message-ID: <697913.24018.qm at web50204.mail.re2.yahoo.com> 
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 
>>
>> We've also had a problem with odor on our 1998 #499. 
>>
>> Prior Owner used rarely. Noticed the smell in the locker and in the 
>> compartment 
>> under the sink upon purchase. 
>>
>> Took the following action: 
>>
>> (1) Replaced the entire head; 
>> (2) Replaced all hoses to/from the head (raw water intake, pumpout) as well 
>> as 
>> sink drain hose; 
>> (3) Replaced the main vent hose; 
>> (4) Replaced the hose from the head to the holding tank; 
>> (5) Removed all wood from the locker, sprayed locker and 
>> compartment?repeatedly 
>> with pet odor 'natures miracle' remover; 
>> (6) Cleaned entire head compartment with bleach/water; 
>> (7) Have used fresh water flush since we purchased the boat, and no solid 
>> waste; 
>> (8) Cleaned the thru-hull vent; 
>>
>> Four?months later, I would say the odor is about 20% improved. 
>>
>> The only other steps I can think of would be: 
>> (1) Replace the holding tank; 
>> (2) Replace hoses to macerator, and the macerator; 
>> (3) Scrub area under the holding tank with bleach/water and odor remover; 
>>
>> But I have no idea if that will really fix the problem. At this point, we 
>> don't 
>> store anything in the locker and are happy the smell doesn't go any further 
>> than 
>> that. 
>>
>> Sean 
>> Libert? #499 
>> San Francisco 
>>
>> ------------------------------ 
>>
>> Message: 2 
>> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:35:34 -0400 
>> From: Fred LEcuyer <fred.lecuyer at live.com> 
>> To: Catalina320list Catalina320list <c320-list at catalina320.com> 
>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] eliminating odor 
>> Message-ID: <SNT113-W37399B1320F4AABC876DDE98A0 at phx.gbl> 
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" 
>>
>>
>> Sean: 
>>
>> Our biggest improvement seemed to come when I re-tefloned the fittings to 
>> the tank and removed the tank to scrub underneath. 
>>
>> Someone further down the E-mail chain suggest that backpressure from 
>> accidently hitting the macerator switch may have caused leakage at the 
>> fittings. That makes sense to me and it's nearly impossible to tell what's 
>> under the tank until you pull it. 
>>
>> Fred 
>>
>>> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:20:11 -0700 
>>> From: spkaldor at yahoo.com 
>>> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
>>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] eliminating odor 
>>>
>>> We've also had a problem with odor on our 1998 #499. 
>>>
>>> Prior Owner used rarely. Noticed the smell in the locker and in the 
>> compartment 
>>> under the sink upon purchase. 
>>>
>>> Took the following action: 
>>>
>>> (1) Replaced the entire head; 
>>> (2) Replaced all hoses to/from the head (raw water intake, pumpout) as 
>> well as 
>>> sink drain hose; 
>>> (3) Replaced the main vent hose; 
>>> (4) Replaced the hose from the head to the holding tank; 
>>> (5) Removed all wood from the locker, sprayed locker and compartment 
>> repeatedly 
>>> with pet odor 'natures miracle' remover; 
>>> (6) Cleaned entire head compartment with bleach/water; 
>>> (7) Have used fresh water flush since we purchased the boat, and no solid 
>> waste; 
>>> (8) Cleaned the thru-hull vent; 
>>>
>>> Four months later, I would say the odor is about 20% improved. 
>>>
>>> The only other steps I can think of would be: 
>>> (1) Replace the holding tank; 
>>> (2) Replace hoses to macerator, and the macerator; 
>>> (3) Scrub area under the holding tank with bleach/water and odor remover; 
>>>
>>> But I have no idea if that will really fix the problem. At this point, we 
>> don't 
>>> store anything in the locker and are happy the smell doesn't go any 
>> further than 
>>> that. 
>>>
>>> Sean 
>>> Libert? #499 
>>> San Francisco 
>>
>> ------------------------------ 
>>
>> Message: 3 
>> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 18:00:00 -0400 
>> From: Irving Grunes <igrunes at gmail.com> 
>> To: C320-List <C320-list at catalina320.org> 
>> Subject: [C320-list] Cockpit shower wand 
>> Message-ID: 
>> <AANLkTimr4vwxdBEF6CBXT1omhq6ftVM0Wn9GQGGNRjt- at mail.gmail.com> 
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 
>>
>> Where to buy replacement shower wand and hose 
>> Irv grunes 
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------ 
>>
>> Message: 4 
>> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:10:55 -0700 (PDT) 
>> From: pat reynolds <lorasalum at yahoo.com> 
>> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
>> Subject: [C320-list] muffler and electrical excitment 
>> Message-ID: <268590.93779.qm at web36503.mail.mud.yahoo.com> 
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii 
>>
>> As a religious follower of the wisdom imparted on this site since its' 
>> inception, I have been fortunate to have avoided many of the problems cited, 
>> ie; head odors (freshwater boat), charger problems, corrosion etc. In the 
>> 15 years we have owned the boat I have only had the muffler and the 
>> electrical fuel pump replaced. ( I know, I just opened pandora's box). I do 
>> have a water under the liner problem which I have been meaning to address 
>> for several of those 15 years (again freshwater only). I think fortunately 
>> however that that problem may have saved the boat. 
>>
>> On a recent single handed return from a long distance race on Lake Michigan 
>> (blessed freshwater) I was awaken at anchor at 3 am by the bilge pump 
>> cycling. It seems that the year old replacement muffler I had gotten from 
>> Catalina had developed two leaks in the bottom (worse than the 14 year old 
>> one I replaced) and motoring that day had filled the bilges and assorted 
>> pockets. Tired and grumbling since I was still 100 miles from home, I 
>> removed the floor boards and hand pumped for a couple of hours. Some of the 
>> water remained, as always, under the liner. 
>>
>> I had the muffler reglassed at the next port and continued on. Two nights 
>> later while in a slip, again at 4 am during a bad electrical storm, I 
>> smelled something burning. I had a fan running off the shore power and 
>> thought it had overheated but it was cool. I turned on the cabin lights 
>> which run off the batteries and noticed a faint wisp of smoke coming from 
>> behind the electrical panel. It was heavier when I opened the panel. 
>> Opening the battery compartment I could see that the charger wire 
>> insulation had burned completely off and these wires had fused onto and 
>> burned the battery cables. These wires run under the liner through conduit 
>> from the starboard to the port side. Apparently a power surge at the marina 
>> had come in thru the shore power cord, burned out the charger and started 
>> the electrical fire. When they pulled the wiring and conduit out I could 
>> see that the conduit (pvc pipe) was burned completely thru under the liner. 
>> I am thinking 
>> that maybe the water underneath had helped keep the fire from spreading. 
>> Except for all of the wiring, charger and battery switch all else was ok. 
>>
>> The electrician did not reconnect the charger wires directly to the 
>> battery, but to the battery switch with fuses. He said that would alleviate 
>> some of the wiring running underneath the liner. He also said that the 
>> reason that the charger breaker did not pop was because the charge went thru 
>> the negative side seeking ground. 
>>
>> This was just a long way of saying that we should be aware of the wiring 
>> which is run thru and under the liner from the engine, charger, panel etc. 
>> In additon to being inaccessible it may also be subject to chafe and 
>> fraying. If I am ever on the boat again during an electrical storm I will 
>> immediately remove the shore power cord. 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------ 
>>
>> Message: 5 
>> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 00:43:47 +0000 (UTC) 
>> From: hcreech at comcast.net 
>> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Cockpit shower wand 
>> Message-ID: 
>> < 
>> 1793164456.820936.1283301827848.JavaMail.root at sz0074a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net 
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 
>>
>> Real easy, Home Depot or Lowes, it's a standard replacement item. That is 
>> where I bought mine. 
>>
>>
>> Herb Creech 
>> Cloud Chaser #606 
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Irving Grunes" <igrunes at gmail.com> 
>> To: "C320-List" <C320-list at catalina320.org> 
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 6:00:00 PM 
>> Subject: [C320-list] Cockpit shower wand 
>>
>> Where to buy replacement shower wand and hose 
>> Irv grunes 
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------ 
>>
>> Message: 6 
>> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:49:07 -0400 
>> From: Irving Grunes <igrunes at gmail.com> 
>> To: C320-List at catalina320.com 
>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Cockpit shower wand 
>> Message-ID: 
>> <AANLkTikz4Ju1H9wbYo_YRyW7nXMHHVxa0LysYLmnj73w at mail.gmail.com> 
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 
>>
>> Sorry, I meant cockpit shower wand. 
>> Irv 
>> #851 
>>
>> On Aug 31, 2010 8:43 PM, <hcreech at comcast.net> wrote: 
>> Real easy, Home Depot or Lowes, it's a standard replacement item. That is 
>> where I bought mine. 
>>
>>
>> Herb Creech 
>> Cloud Chaser #606 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Irving Grunes" <igrunes at gmail.com> 
>> To: "C320-List" <C320-li... 
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------ 
>>
>> Message: 7 
>> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 01:55:14 +0000 (UTC) 
>> From: hcreech at comcast.net 
>> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Cockpit shower wand 
>> Message-ID: 
>> < 
>> 405149512.824953.1283306114833.JavaMail.root at sz0074a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net 
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 
>>
>> That was what I was talking about, read it right the first time. 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Herb 
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Irving Grunes" <igrunes at gmail.com> 
>> To: C320-List at catalina320.com 
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 8:49:07 PM 
>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Cockpit shower wand 
>>
>> Sorry, I meant cockpit shower wand. 
>> Irv 
>> #851 
>>
>> On Aug 31, 2010 8:43 PM, <hcreech at comcast.net> wrote: 
>> Real easy, Home Depot or Lowes, it's a standard replacement item. That is 
>> where I bought mine. 
>>
>>
>> Herb Creech 
>> Cloud Chaser #606 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Irving Grunes" <igrunes at gmail.com> 
>> To: "C320-List" <C320-li... 
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------ 
>>
>> Message: 8 
>> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:29:26 -0400 
>> From: Scott Thompson <surprise at thompson87.com> 
>> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Cockpit shower wand 
>> Message-ID: <4C7E3916.8040401 at thompson87.com> 
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed 
>>
>> These are manufactured by SSI Custom Plastics in Hollywood, Maryland. 
>> They were very helpful when I called them to get a replacement a few 
>> years back. 
>>
>> See http://www.ssicustomplastics.com/ 
>>
>> -- 
>> Scott Thompson 
>> Surprise, #653 
>>
>>
>> Irving Grunes wrote: 
>>> Where to buy replacement shower wand and hose 
>>> Irv grunes 
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------ 
>>
>> Message: 9 
>> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 07:47:10 -0400 
>> From: Robert Seastream <robert.seastream at comcast.net> 
>> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
>> Subject: [C320-list] Hurricane Earl 
>> Message-ID: <C517D7D0-582E-400F-85B0-7F144AED46EA at comcast.net> 
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes 
>>
>> All: 
>>
>> Not to unduly excite everyone, but in the event of a direct hit 
>> (doubtful the case here) where do you feel your boat would be safer: 
>> in a slip, on a mooring, or out of the water? 
>> I lean towards on a mooring because there's less 'things' to fly about 
>> and hit the boat. On land she'd be on jackstands; more likely lying 
>> next to them after the storm passed. 
>>
>> Bob Seastream 
>> Intuition # 906 
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------ 
>>
>> Message: 10 
>> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 12:00:15 +0000 
>> From: ericstillwellevans at gmail.com 
>> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Hurricane Earl 
>> Message-ID: 
>>
>> <1158712043-1283342415-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-275800562- at bda2817.bisx.prod.on.blackberry 
>> Content-Type: text/plain 
>>
>> I used to feel the same way until a Squall traveling 40mph with 85mph winds 
>> lasting only 10min dragged my boat and others and caused damage. 
>>
>> I would think with the storm surge related to hurricanes a mooring may be 
>> fine but I would extend your mooring lines. 
>>
>> Rick 
>> 724 
>> ------Original Message------ 
>> From: Robert Seastream 
>> Sender: c320-list-bounces at lists.catalina320.com 
>> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
>> ReplyTo: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
>> Subject: [C320-list] Hurricane Earl 
>> Sent: Sep 1, 2010 7:47 AM 
>>
>> All: 
>>
>> Not to unduly excite everyone, but in the event of a direct hit 
>> (doubtful the case here) where do you feel your boat would be safer: 
>> in a slip, on a mooring, or out of the water? 
>> I lean towards on a mooring because there's less 'things' to fly about 
>> and hit the boat. On land she'd be on jackstands; more likely lying 
>> next to them after the storm passed. 
>>
>> Bob Seastream 
>> Intuition # 906 
>>
>>
>> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile 
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------ 
>>
>> Message: 11 
>> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 05:01:55 -0700 (PDT) 
>> From: jim brown <jbrown5093 at yahoo.com> 
>> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Hurricane Earl 
>> Message-ID: <732454.82453.qm at web58604.mail.re3.yahoo.com> 
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 
>>
>> BoatUS has a whole section on hurricane preparation from the safest place 
>> to be to what kind of lines-not nylon- to use to what chafing gear is best 
>> etc Very helpful 
>>
>> --- On Wed, 9/1/10, Robert Seastream <robert.seastream at comcast.net> wrote: 
>>
>> From: Robert Seastream <robert.seastream at comcast.net> 
>> Subject: [C320-list] Hurricane Earl 
>> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
>> Date: Wednesday, September 1, 2010, 7:47 AM 
>>
>> All: 
>>
>> Not to unduly excite everyone, but in the event of a direct hit (doubtful 
>> the case here) where do you feel your boat would be safer:? in a slip, on a 
>> mooring, or out of the water? 
>> I lean towards on a mooring because there's less 'things' to fly about and 
>> hit the boat.? On land she'd be on jackstands; more likely lying next to 
>> them after the storm passed. 
>>
>> Bob Seastream 
>> Intuition # 906 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------ 
>>
>> Message: 12 
>> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:04:23 -0400 
>> From: "=?utf-8?B?YXJnYXRlczJuZEBjb21jYXN0Lm5ldA==?=" 
>> <argates2nd at comcast.net> 
>> To: "=?utf-8?B?Um9iZXJ0IFNlYXN0cmVhbQ==?=" 
>> <robert.seastream at comcast.net>, C320-List at Catalina320.com 
>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Hurricane Earl 
>> Message-ID: <20100901120417.B6650448230 at homiemail-mx2.g.dreamhost.com> 
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 
>>
>> Ins req'ts? 
>>
>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone 
>>
>> ----- Reply message ----- 
>> From: "Robert Seastream" <robert.seastream at comcast.net> 
>> Date: Wed, Sep 1, 2010 7:47 am 
>> Subject: [C320-list] Hurricane Earl 
>> To: <C320-List at Catalina320.com> 
>>
>> All: 
>>
>> Not to unduly excite everyone, but in the event of a direct hit (doubtful 
>> the case here) where do you feel your boat would be safer: in a slip, on a 
>> mooring, or out of the water? 
>> I lean towards on a mooring because there's less 'things' to fly about and 
>> hit the boat. On land she'd be on jackstands; more likely lying next to 
>> them after the storm passed. 
>>
>> Bob Seastream 
>> Intuition # 906 
>>
>> ------------------------------ 
>>
>> Message: 13 
>> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 08:37:18 -0400 
>> From: "Kurt Budelmann" <krbmd77 at charter.net> 
>> To: <C320-List at Catalina320.com> 
>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Hurricane Earl 
>> Message-ID: <F14A55A0B8894971891B266CC66DAA25 at lchcs.org> 
>> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; 
>> reply-type=response 
>>
>> Seaworthy, the Boat US magazine showed that the best preparation was on 
>> land 
>> with jackstands and guide wires preventing the boat from moving. I think 
>> they had 4 to 6 guide wires anchored in the ground around the boat. Also, 
>> their insurance will offset the cost. 
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Robert Seastream" <robert.seastream at comcast.net> 
>> To: <C320-List at Catalina320.com> 
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 7:47 AM 
>> Subject: [C320-list] Hurricane Earl 
>>
>>
>>> All: 
>>>
>>> Not to unduly excite everyone, but in the event of a direct hit 
>> (doubtful 
>>> the case here) where do you feel your boat would be safer: in a slip, 
>> on 
>>> a mooring, or out of the water? 
>>> I lean towards on a mooring because there's less 'things' to fly about 
>>> and hit the boat. On land she'd be on jackstands; more likely lying 
>> next 
>>> to them after the storm passed. 
>>>
>>> Bob Seastream 
>>> Intuition # 906 
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------ 
>>
>> Message: 14 
>> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 12:38:56 +0000 
>> From: "Jeff Hare" <catalina at thehares.com> 
>> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Hurricane Earl 
>> Message-ID: 
>>
>> <255742206-1283344729-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-419593409- at bda284.bisx.prod.on.blackberry 
>> Content-Type: text/plain 
>>
>> In our area Bob, land is the best option as yards around here are used to 
>> blocking boats on stands for high winds. Maybe 100 mph winds would require 
>> some staked lines or tied off on trees. I know my boat with cover has done 
>> fine in 70mph on land. Ins companies will often pay for haulout if a storm 
>> is imminent and damage is likely. 
>>
>> I would say moorings next assuming the mooring block and tackle is solid. 
>>
>> Docks are the worst because the boat will get pounded a lot and can't face 
>> the wind. 
>>
>> Take your canvas down, center the boom and tie off the aft end to both 
>> stern cleats. Secure all loose lines and lead halyards where they won't 
>> chaffe on the spreaders. 
>>
>> -Jeff 
>>
>> ------Original Message------ 
>> From: Robert Seastream 
>> Sender: c320-list-bounces at lists.catalina320.com 
>> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
>> ReplyTo: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
>> Subject: [C320-list] Hurricane Earl 
>> Sent: Sep 1, 2010 7:47 AM 
>>
>> All: 
>>
>> Not to unduly excite everyone, but in the event of a direct hit 
>> (doubtful the case here) where do you feel your boat would be safer: 
>> in a slip, on a mooring, or out of the water? 
>> I lean towards on a mooring because there's less 'things' to fly about 
>> and hit the boat. On land she'd be on jackstands; more likely lying 
>> next to them after the storm passed. 
>>
>> Bob Seastream 
>> Intuition # 906 
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------ 
>>
>> Message: 15 
>> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 10:07:45 -0500 
>> From: chester carson <cmkit10 at gmail.com> 
>> To: C320-List at catalina320.com 
>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] muffler and electrical excitment 
>> Message-ID: 
>> <AANLkTimJm2YoBp05rCzKkLKsTonCSdZ4-GGBk+2m9=Gd at mail.gmail.com> 
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 
>>
>> Pat 
>> that is similar to the fire I had and the catalina solution is to fuse the 
>> battery charger wires at the battery. They have a diagram with specs that 
>> they can send you. I believe that ABYC now requires this on new boats. 
>> Kit Carson 
>> #223 
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:10 PM, pat reynolds <lorasalum at yahoo.com> wrote: 
>>
>>> As a religious follower of the wisdom imparted on this site since its' 
>>> inception, I have been fortunate to have avoided many of the problems 
>> cited, 
>>> ie; head odors (freshwater boat), charger problems, corrosion etc. In 
>> the 
>>> 15 years we have owned the boat I have only had the muffler and the 
>>> electrical fuel pump replaced. ( I know, I just opened pandora's box). I 
>> do 
>>> have a water under the liner problem which I have been meaning to address 
>>> for several of those 15 years (again freshwater only). I think 
>> fortunately 
>>> however that that problem may have saved the boat. 
>>>
>>> On a recent single handed return from a long distance race on Lake 
>> Michigan 
>>> (blessed freshwater) I was awaken at anchor at 3 am by the bilge pump 
>>> cycling. It seems that the year old replacement muffler I had gotten 
>> from 
>>> Catalina had developed two leaks in the bottom (worse than the 14 year 
>> old 
>>> one I replaced) and motoring that day had filled the bilges and assorted 
>>> pockets. Tired and grumbling since I was still 100 miles from home, I 
>>> removed the floor boards and hand pumped for a couple of hours. Some of 
>> the 
>>> water remained, as always, under the liner. 
>>>
>>> I had the muffler reglassed at the next port and continued on. Two 
>> nights 
>>> later while in a slip, again at 4 am during a bad electrical storm, I 
>>> smelled something burning. I had a fan running off the shore power and 
>>> thought it had overheated but it was cool. I turned on the cabin lights 
>>> which run off the batteries and noticed a faint wisp of smoke coming from 
>>> behind the electrical panel. It was heavier when I opened the panel. 
>>> Opening the battery compartment I could see that the charger wire 
>>> insulation had burned completely off and these wires had fused onto and 
>>> burned the battery cables. These wires run under the liner through 
>> conduit 
>>> from the starboard to the port side. Apparently a power surge at the 
>> marina 
>>> had come in thru the shore power cord, burned out the charger and started 
>>> the electrical fire. When they pulled the wiring and conduit out I could 
>>> see that the conduit (pvc pipe) was burned completely thru under the 
>> liner. 
>>> I am thinking 
>>> that maybe the water underneath had helped keep the fire from spreading. 
>>> Except for all of the wiring, charger and battery switch all else was 
>> ok. 
>>> The electrician did not reconnect the charger wires directly to the 
>>> battery, but to the battery switch with fuses. He said that would 
>> alleviate 
>>> some of the wiring running underneath the liner. He also said that the 
>>> reason that the charger breaker did not pop was because the charge went 
>> thru 
>>> the negative side seeking ground. 
>>>
>>> This was just a long way of saying that we should be aware of the wiring 
>>> which is run thru and under the liner from the engine, charger, panel 
>> etc. 
>>> In additon to being inaccessible it may also be subject to chafe and 
>>> fraying. If I am ever on the boat again during an electrical storm I 
>> will 
>>> immediately remove the shore power cord. 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------ 
>>
>> Message: 16 
>> Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 08:57:34 -0700 (PDT) 
>> From: pat reynolds <lorasalum at yahoo.com> 
>> To: C320-List at Catalina320.com 
>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] muffler and electrical excitment 
>> Message-ID: <118319.86321.qm at web36503.mail.mud.yahoo.com> 
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 
>>
>> Thanks Kit I think that is what the electrician told me about the 
>> standards when he put the fuses on the wires at the batt switch. I know 
>> less about this field than I do computers so I forgot to ask him if this 
>> affected the way the batteries are charged on shore power, ie both charged 
>> no matter what position the switch is on. 
>>
>> Pat 
>>
>> --- On Wed, 9/1/10, chester carson <cmkit10 at gmail.com> wrote: 
>>
>>> From: chester carson <cmkit10 at gmail.com> 
>>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] muffler and electrical excitment 
>>> To: C320-List at catalina320.com 
>>> Date: Wednesday, September 1, 2010, 10:07 AM 
>>> Pat 
>>> that is similar to the fire I had and the catalina solution 
>>> is to fuse the 
>>> battery charger wires at the battery. They have a diagram 
>>> with specs that 
>>> they can send you. I believe that ABYC now requires this on 
>>> new boats. 
>>> Kit Carson 
>>> #223 
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:10 PM, pat reynolds <lorasalum at yahoo.com> 
>>> wrote: 
>>>
>>>> As a religious follower of the wisdom imparted on this 
>>> site since its' 
>>>> inception, I have been fortunate to have avoided many 
>>> of the problems cited, 
>>>> ie; head odors (freshwater boat), charger problems, 
>>> corrosion etc.? In the 
>>>> 15 years we have owned the boat I have only had the 
>>> muffler and the 
>>>> electrical fuel pump replaced. ( I know, I just opened 
>>> pandora's box).? I do 
>>>> have a water under the liner problem which I have been 
>>> meaning to address 
>>>> for several of those 15 years (again freshwater 
>>> only).? I think fortunately 
>>>> however that that problem may have saved the boat. 
>>>>
>>>> On a recent single handed return from a long distance 
>>> race on Lake Michigan 
>>>> (blessed freshwater) I was awaken at anchor at? 3 
>>> am by the bilge pump 
>>>> cycling.? It seems that the year old replacement 
>>> muffler I had gotten from 
>>>> Catalina had developed two leaks in the bottom (worse 
>>> than the 14 year old 
>>>> one I replaced) and motoring that day had filled the 
>>> bilges and assorted 
>>>> pockets.? Tired and grumbling since I was still 
>>> 100 miles from home, I 
>>>> removed the floor boards and hand pumped for a couple 
>>> of hours.? Some of the 
>>>> water remained, as always, under the liner. 
>>>>
>>>> I had the muffler reglassed at the next port and 
>>> continued on.? Two nights 
>>>> later while in a slip, again at 4 am during a bad 
>>> electrical storm, I 
>>>> smelled something burning.? I had a fan running 
>>> off the shore power and 
>>>> thought it had overheated but it was cool.? I 
>>> turned on the cabin lights 
>>>> which run off the batteries and noticed a faint wisp 
>>> of smoke coming from 
>>>> behind the electrical panel.? It was heavier when 
>>> I opened the panel. 
>>>> ? Opening the battery compartment I could see that 
>>> the charger wire 
>>>> insulation had burned completely off and these wires 
>>> had fused onto and 
>>>> burned the battery cables.? These wires run under 
>>> the liner through conduit 
>>>> from the starboard to the port side.? Apparently 
>>> a power surge at the marina 
>>>> had come in thru the shore power cord, burned out the 
>>> charger and started 
>>>> the electrical fire.? When they pulled the wiring 
>>> and conduit out I could 
>>>> see that the conduit (pvc pipe) was burned completely 
>>> thru under the liner. 
>>>> ? I am thinking 
>>>> ? that maybe the water underneath had helped keep 
>>> the fire from spreading. 
>>>> ? Except for all of the wiring, charger and 
>>> battery switch all else was ok. 
>>>> The electrician did not reconnect the 

-- 
Scott Thompson
Surprise, #653



More information about the C320-list mailing list