[C320-list] fin vs. wing keel
Andrew Santangelo
andrew_santangelo at mac.com
Sat Oct 29 08:41:52 PDT 2011
Lou,
I have seen two wing keels auger into the mud on Lake Macatawa in Michigan (one with sails flying). One boat seemed to panic and got stuck further; it needed a power boat to get them out. I never ran aground with the wing, but then again I made it a point to keep away from shallow water. Of course there are other options with a wing in areas where you can use the tide to your advantage. Just do not run aground during high tide.
The one time I did run around with the fin. I had my crew lean to the side to heal the boat to change the effective draft; we floated and backed out.
Best Regards,
Andrew
C320
"Dawn Treader"
#333
San Francisco
On Oct 29, 2011, at 11:22 AM, BAdams3491 at aol.com wrote:
> I've been aground once in my C320. The boat was in forward, at an idle
> with the sails down. Put it in reverse immediately and powered off...bottom
> was hard.
>
> Bert
> At Ease
> #442
>
>
> In a message dated 10/29/2011 10:15:38 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> lou at flyingmonkey.im writes:
>
> I'd like to hear from those who have actually experienced a grounding with
> the wing keel. This is my first wing keel vessel and I'd like to know what
> to expect when it happens. I'm a realist when it comes to these things.
> There are those who have run aground and those who have not "yet" run
> aground.
>
> Thanks,
> Lou Hodac
> S/V Blue Moon
> Hull#702
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 29, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Andrew Santangelo
> <andrew_santangelo at mac.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I would also add the fin keel works for most of the great lakes. We had
> some close calls in the Kalamazoo River in Saugatuck off Lake Michigan,
> otherwise the fin keel also works great in this region.
>>
>> The big issue is if you plan to race your vessel at all and want a
> chance to place you really need to go to the fin keel - the pointing ability and
> carrying less mass is a huge difference. Now I cruised extensively all
> over the great lakes before racing and I still cruise quite a bit and I have
> to say pointing better towards my destination and going a tad faster to
> beat some coming weather is an added boost I love. I have also see a few wing
> keels run aground. It is not pretty getting off vs. a fin keel. When
> sailing in shallow water, I really try to avoid cutting it close regardless
> of fin or wing keel. Of course that is what GPS, chart plotters and tide
> charts are for.
>>
>> Regarding west coast sailing since I did the massive move/shipping of
> Dawn Treader to SFO - lots of wind, you fly with the tides (weather you want
> to or not), and a fin keel is totally fine.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Andrew
>>
>> C320
>> "Dawn Treader"
>> #333
>> San Francisco
>>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 29, 2011, at 9:03 AM, Brad Kuether wrote:
>>
>>> If you can sail comfortably in your waters without worrying about going
> aground get the fin. The performace difference is remarkable. But if
> you have any doubt on depth, you open up a LOT of options with the wing. And
> to be honest, I move along OK. (folding prop really helps here...)
> Pointing is a different matter. I find with the 150 up front and sheeted in
> tight, I do better, but nothing great.
>>>
>>> My prior C&C had a 5'4" fin, and that was boarderline. I did OK in the
> upper Chesapeake. Some anchorages were out of scope.
>>>
>>> 6 feet plus under a Catalina 320? No way. Not here.
>>>
>>> -Brad, Mary, Monica, and Jarod
>>> "Independence"
>>> 2004 Catalina 320 Hull 1006
>>> Middle River, MD
>>>
>>> PS - First snowfall of the season has begun in earnest. Its supposed
> to be bright and sunny with highs still in the low 60s!!!!!!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Burti" <clburti at gmail.com>
>>> To: <C320-List at catalina320.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 1:15 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] fin vs. wing keel
>>>
>>>
>>> The simplest rule of thumb is for East Coast cruising...get a wing
>>> keel...West Coast, a fin is fine.
>>>
>>> There is simply too much thin water South of Norfolk not to take
>>> advantage of the extra foot of clearance..
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Gene Helfman <genehelfman at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>>> Dear all: In our ongoing search for a 320 (ca. 2000 +/-), we've run
> into a
>>>> mixture of opinions on the qualities of the shallow vs. deep draft
> boats.
>>>> We have a harbor and hoist situation in our home port that makes 6 ft
> draft
>>>> problematic but not impossible. Would anyone like to chime in on the
> costs
>>>> and benefits of the wing keel boats (of which fewer were produced and
> are
>>>> harder to find) vs. the deeper-draft fin keel boats? We intend to
> cruise
>>>> not race so faster turning isn't much of an issue.
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>> gene
>>>> --
>>>> Gene Helfman, Professor Emeritus
>>>> Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia
>>>> PERMANENT address:
>>>> 498 Shoreland Dr., Lopez Is., WA 98261
>>>> (360) 468-2136
>>>> genehelfman at gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> "Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day,
>>>> Teach a man to fish and he'll deplete the
>>>> oceans."
>>>>
More information about the C320-list
mailing list