[C320-list] Yanmar exhaust architecture

colloua5 at aol.com colloua5 at aol.com
Fri Oct 17 06:13:04 PDT 2014




These part numbers are they from yamar direct ?


Thanks for all the info


on another note .....my muffler box failed, I am going to clean it, re-epoxy the joint where the two meet and then fiberglass mesh the two together on the outside  completing the sealed unit. From what I read the new units seem as poorly designed as the original.


I am contemplating having one made of brass with  soldered joints over the winter, pressure test it and install, the cost should be equivalent to the fiberglass replacement unit

 




-----Original Message-----
From: tharrison <tharrison at innovations-plus.com>
To: C320-List <C320-List at Catalina320.com>
Sent: Thu, Oct 16, 2014 11:09 am
Subject: Re: [C320-list] Yanmar exhaust architecture


One item to note is hose size. Mine was 1 5/8. 

There is a reverse direction joint between the elbow and mixing elbow. Play with 
this piece and the final orientation.

124070-13520 mixing elbow
128370-13610 elbow
104214-13580 joint

Gasket, I do not have this part number. 

High temp gasket seal - red from NaPa 

Some anti seize compound for on the joint threads. 

That is all I can thing about.

Others please verify the part numbers. I fairly sure. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 16, 2014, at 6:53 AM, Graeme Clark <cg at skyflyer.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> Timothy
> 
> Thats exactly why I wanted a photo or diagram (or even part numbers) , so I 
can get an idea of how the thing is put together following what would appear to 
be an early experiment on mine!
> 
> For example at what point of the exhast doe sthe water injection take place? 
Itr seems to me that the cooling water exits on the port sode of the engine and 
the exhaust on the starboard side, so some form of connection needs to be made 
between the two. The ‘standard’ Yanmar exhast injection elbow has the water 
entering the exhaust just a few inches from the engine block, i.e., really 
early; mine has the water enetering about 18 inches downstream, hence, 
presumably the need to lag the prt beforehand which receives no cooling effect!
> 
> Regards
> 
> Graeme
> 
> 
> 
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 20:27:53 -0400
> From: Timothy Osburn <tosburn1958 at gmail.com>
> To: C320-List at catalina320.com
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Yanmar exhaust architecture
> Message-ID:
>    <CAJEc2k1MKDpjndsjfeZcPNCAAC3xWk0nXZoogQ=6dBmdvtE6ww at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> I just had mine replaced last month and the mechanic was able to use off
> the shelf parts. I have the same engine.
>> On Oct 14, 2014 5:37 PM, "Graeme Clark" <cg at skyflyer.co.uk> wrote:
>> 
>> I have just transitioned from one/third shared ownership of hull #303 with
>> a Westerbeke to sole ownership of hull # 366 which (I have been told) is
>> one of the very first to be fitted with a Yanmar 3GM30F engine.
>> 
>> The exhaust arrangement/architecture is very different from the Westerbeke
>> and I wondered if this was now ?standard? in all Yanmar engined 320s or has
>> it been superseded with something else?
>> 
>> The exhaust is on the starboard side of the engine, so there is a length
>> of lagged exhaust pipe as per this photo
>> 
>> http://i59.tinypic.com/244tch3.jpg
>> 
>> which then connects  to a section on the port side where the water is
>> injected. The entire assembly looks a bit ?home made?!
>> 
>> If I have to replace the exhaust ?elbow? (in reality not an elbow at all)
>> where do I get this piece or is it custom made by a fabricator.
>> 
>> If anyone else with a 3GM30F has a photo or diagram of the exhaust
>> arrangement I?d be most grateful
>> 
>> Many thanks
>> 
>> Graeme,
>> Britain

 


More information about the C320-list mailing list