[C320-list] Check your stem fitting - near catastrophic failure to C320
Graeme Clark
cg at skyflyer.co.uk
Tue Aug 4 08:17:11 PDT 2015
Or try this link
http://oi58.tinypic.com/t8lwz9.jpg
G
Sent from mobile: please excuse typos etc.!
> On 4 Aug 2015, at 15:55, Daryl Hunt <drhunt at rochester.rr.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Graeme,
> FYI, when I click on the tinypic link I don't see the image.
>
> /Best regards,
> /
>
> /Daryl
> '99 C320 #660 Believe
> /
>
>
>> On 8/04/15 10:15 AM, Graeme Clark wrote:
>>
>> Just to correct my own post!
>>
>> The perspective of the picture I posted made me wrongly state there was a backing plate, I can now see that it is in fact looking at the entire broken cross-section of the vertical bar to which the forestay (headstay?) connects.
>>
>> You can see a tiny rusty part, which someone with better engineering knowledge may confirm to be crevice corrosion - almost certainly starting from a tiny pit where the triangular gussets are welded in place?
>>
>> Still very tricky to spot and worth a good look at your own boat to check for a similar issue maybe?
>>
>> Graeme
>>
>>> On 4 Aug 2015, at 13:12, Graeme Clark <cg at skyflyer.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> The C320 that I used to share before buying my own, suffered a near catastrophic failure of the stem fitting that attaches the forestay to the bow, last week;
>>>
>>> How they didn't lose the mast I don't know
>>>
>>> The boat is serial no 303 built in 1996
>>>
>>> This link, pasted into your browser, will show the failure, the red arrow is the fractured surface
>>> http://tinypic.com/r/t8lwz9/8
>>> (by the way, the halyard you see is the jury-rig to keep the mast up!)
>>>
>>> For interest you may wish to see the current design of replacement offered by CD
>>> http://www.catalinadirect.com/index.cfm/product/2573_699/stem-fitting-c-320-c-34-c-36.cfm
>>>
>>> Note that CD state they have removed the unnecessary and non structural triangular gussets that are clearly visible on the part that failed.
>>>
>>> But you will also note that there is a ‘backing plate’ joining those two gussets that is located close to and to the rear of the part that failed.
>>>
>>> My guess is that a small defect or other stress concentration was present on the rear of the vertical bar and over the years repeated flexing has caused a fatigue crack to develop and propagate.
>>>
>>> The point is that it is very difficult to see this area, and I think any crack would be very unlikely to be spotted with a routine cursory inspection.
>>>
>>> I have no idea if there’s any history of these parts failing, but If so I was not aware of it.
>>>
>>> I would strongly recommend a careful inspection of your own boat to make sure that no crack is developing in the same area.
>>>
>>> I hope the above description is clear, but if I have confused you, please ask away and I will try and explain further
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Graeme
>>> #366, Jaskar
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
More information about the C320-list
mailing list