[C320-list] 320 vs. something just a little bigger
Paul Ducham
paul at ducham.com
Fri Dec 18 09:49:34 PST 2020
I couldn't agree more. Chuck Paine said something like, "A boat that
looks a bargain on Craigslist will most likely just make you hate
sailing."
My frugality comment was strictly about asking prices of 320s vs 355s.
Asking prices for 320s from 1999-2008 range from $60-90k. While the
asking prices of used 355s have been $150-190k.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [C320-list] 320 vs. something just a little bigger
From: Jack Brennan <[1]jackbrennan at bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, December 18, 2020 11:12 am
To: "[2]C320-List at Catalina320.com" <[3]C320-List at Catalina320.com>
Hi Paul:
Frugality is good, but remember that itâs always better (and cheaper in
the long run) to spend more money on an updated boat in excellent
shape.
Neglected boats are a money pit. Even boats that look good, but have
old sails and electronics, can cost you a great deal of money to get
right. These days, even a bottom job can run close to 3K in many
locales. Whether the boat needs one should figure into the price.
Jack Brennan
Sonas, 1998 Catalina 320
Tierra Verde, Fl.
Dolphin Cruising Club of Tampa Bay
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Paul Ducham
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2020 7:23 AM
To: [4]C320-List at Catalina320.com; [5]c320-list at lists.catalina320.com
Subject: Re: [C320-list] 320 vs. something just a little bigger
Thanks everyone for sharing your experience and perspective. Each and
everyone of you made points that were invaluable to my decision.
Your comments helped me reduce my short-list to only Catalinas, and
most likely a 320 Mark II. The 355 isn't out of the running. I really
think the 355 is a great design. But at about double the price, my
frugality struggles with the ratio of incremental benefits of the 355
compared with the 320 relative to incremental cost.
Cheers!
Paul
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [C320-list] 320 vs. something just a little bigger
From: <[1][6]amiraults at sympatico.ca>
Date: Thu, December 17, 2020 4:50 pm
To: <[2][7]c320-list at lists.catalina320.com>
Paul:
Re-read what Pat Reynolds has written, as there is much there to chew
upon.
Twelve years ago, at age 53, I went looking for my final, retirement
boat.
In 2007 I moved up from a 1981 28 foot Tanzer to a 2001 C320. The
former
boat had been a bit of a project that allowed me to "learn by doing" in
regards necessary maintenance. Among the things learned was that I
didn't
want another project boat to sail while I completed my final
pre-retirement
employment laps. I wanted a well cared for boat old enough that the
bugs
were worked out, desirable owner add-ons were already actually added
on, and
with a bit of depreciation making it more affordable. It also needed to
be
young enough that aside from regular cleaning it would not need heavy
maintenance for 4-5 years. This would allow me to get to just sail the
boat
while winding up my career - such as it was. All this has come to pass.
Everything Pat wrote about performance I have found to be true. His
observation that the hull grows bigger with every spring's wash and wax
is
also true. An additional thought is the impact of personal surprise. I
was
VERY surprised by the need for triple bypass surgery during the period
of
launch prep in '19. Recovery was long, and Bear has been all the boat I
can
handle. I do day sail. I do race her with the addition of four crew. At
least once a season (except '19) I take her out single-handed;
obviously
possible to do, but every change of direction requires planning and
organization. For day sailing with friends it is a great boat, with
plenty
of room on deck and below. The same for weekends on the hook with the
spouse. So long as you are willing to be creative with v-berth storage
I
would expect that longer duration cruises on The Great Lakes for two
would
find the C320 ideal.
A bigger boat is always more comfortable, and great if you can afford
it.
Before you acquire one, look to your spouse if it is your retirement
intention to cruise. My spouse is willing, assuming that there is not
more
than 15 degrees of heel. Further, she's 5' tall with a light upper body
structure, so she lacks upper body strength to the point that I
replaced the
original 150% head sail with a 135% modified Yankee cut so she could do
some
initial grinding on the tacks. Finally, she's willing to pull or
release
lines, or take the wheel while I raise the main or deal with a minor
issue;
but will not take the helm in/out of harbour, while minor mobility
issues
prevent her from jumping onto the dock to secure the boat on entering
our
slip. This means that when it is just the two of us in and out of
harbour it
is kind of like single handing. Much of the sailing we do feels
somewhat
like sailing alone. How do you see your significant other with this?
Will
this work for you on a bigger boat? Shit also happens and the skipper
usually carries the greater responsibility for boat handling. He who
handles
more is more likely to get hurt. In the event of an injury, at what
point
would a boat be too big for your spouse to handle with you only
providing
verbal assistance?
These aren't starry-eyed n-footitis questions, but they're still valid
considerations. I am not in a position to advise on the size of your
next/last boat as I don't know you that well. Bigger is more
comfortable,
and offers more crew and guest possibilities. The C320 can sleep seven,
but
I don't know five more people that I like THAT much. Of the boats I
have
been on, my limited experience is to recommend you satisfy the purchase
within the Catalina family. They appear to be built up to a standard
rather
than down to a price. When I have been unpleasantly surprised by
conditions
to the point where I became fearful, Bear didn't bat a padeye. I have
to
quit before Bear does. And a funny thing, at my club the Catalinas tend
to
be sailed more.
Brian Amirault
797 Waltzing Bear, too
References
1. [8]mailto:amiraults at sympatico.ca
2. [9]mailto:c320-list at lists.catalina320.com
References
1. mailto:jackbrennan at bellsouth.net
2. mailto:C320-List at Catalina320.com
3. mailto:C320-List at Catalina320.com
4. mailto:C320-List at Catalina320.com
5. mailto:c320-list at lists.catalina320.com
6. mailto:amiraults at sympatico.ca
7. mailto:c320-list at lists.catalina320.com
8. mailto:amiraults at sympatico.ca
9. mailto:c320-list at lists.catalina320.com
More information about the C320-list
mailing list