[C320-list] down wind in light air

Weikel Paul Paul.Weikel at theglassgroup.com
Sun Jun 25 12:58:11 PDT 2006


Allan,

Had a great time Saturday evening.

Hope the rest of the trip goes well.  We packed up early this morning as it
looked like rain all day.

By the way -  Are you missing a cantaloupe ?  Guess what I found in the back
of the Jeep.  I'll let you know how it tastes !!!


Sail fast and enjoy.  Hope the weather cooperates.  Say hi to Linda.


Paul & Deb
Second Chance
#361




-----Original Message-----
From: allan.field at comcast.net [mailto:allan.field at comcast.net] 
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 12:49 PM
To: C320-List
Subject: Re: [C320-list] down wind in light air

Rod - If you were on the Bay when the Volvo guys went down the Bay, that is
the way they did it.  The were flying spinnakers and gybing back and forth
down the eastern side of the Bay, versus going dead downwind.  

Since I don't have a spinnaker and the main blankets the genoa on a 165
course, I do use the pole, tie down the boom, and go dead down wind.  Coming
up the Bay this earlier this week with the pole out, were were making 7.4
knots from the Bridge to the Patapsco.  There is no way I could achieve
those speeds broad reaching without a pole or spinnaker.  The day before, a
J35 went by us with a  spinnaker flying off of a retractable bowsprit.
Within 10 minutes of passing us, he was at least 1/2 mile away.  That was
pretty impressive to watch.

Look for us Sunday afternoon in Swan Creek.  We are on the Sassafras now and
hope to get to where you are sometime Sunday.  We had a great visit with
Paul and Deb Weikel last evening who u nfortunately won't be joining us in
San Diego this year as Deb is back in school.

Allan S. Field
Sea Sahdow - #808
Columbia, MD

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "Rod Boer" <rod.boer1 at verizon.net> 

> Dick, 
> 
> Are you saying that the performance sailing at 165 relative with 
> occasionally jibing to reach a location dead down wind is better than
using 
> a whisker pole and sailing direct downwind using wing to wing? 
> 
> Rod Boer 
> Odyssey, #688 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Richard A. Walker" 
> To: "'C320-List'" 
> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 12:59 PM 
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] down wind in light air 
> 
> 
> >I find sailing at 165 relative much better than 180 to the wind. The
POLAR 
> > chart on the web site confirms that. 
> > 
> > My furling main with a lose footed main that allows me to let out the
foot 
> > of the sail helps in a down wind situation. I also do not have the worry

> > of 
> > an unintentional jibe. 
> > 
> > 
> > Cheers, 
> > 
> > Dick Walker 
> > C-320 (687) WindWalker II 
> > 740 Olive Ave. 
> > Coronado, CA 92118-2136 
> > 619.435.8986-----Original Message----- 
> > From: C320-List-bounces at catalina320.com 
> > [mailto:C320-List-bounces at catalina320.com] On Behalf Of Lachance,
Michael 
> > B 
> > (ISD, IT) 
> > Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 9:51 AM 
> > To: C320-List 
> > Subject: Re: [C320-list] down wind in light air 
> > 
> > A question for the racers out there: Down wind in light air (less than 
> > 10kts) on a 320 with a pole but no spinnaker, are you better off going 
> > wing & wing straight to mark or broad reaching & jibing, i.e. running 
> > angles ?? 
> > Mike 
> > Seychelle, #141 
> > 
> > 
> >
************************************************************************* 
> > This communication, including attachments, is 
> > for the exclusive use of addressee and may contain proprietary, 
> > confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended 
> > recipient, any use, copying, disclosure, dissemination or distribution
is 
> > strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify 
> > the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this communication and 
> > destroy all copies. 
> >
************************************************************************* 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 




More information about the C320-list mailing list