[C320-list] Club Racing the C320

Orlando.Duran at AveryDennison.com Orlando.Duran at AveryDennison.com
Tue Aug 28 19:02:56 PDT 2007


There's a port list?
----------------------------------
Regards,
OD

Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Weiner" [esquirecatering at rcn.com]
Sent: 08/28/2007 06:48 PM
To: "'C320-List'" <c320-list at catalina320.com>
Cc: straum_rpi at yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [C320-list] Club Racing the C320

Actually, we removed the head and holding tank (saves weight) but that
really increased the port list so we replaced with a beer keg cooler
with keg inside tapped on deck.  No port list, and if there is no one
cares.

Adam

-----Original Message-----
From: c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com
[mailto:c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com] On Behalf Of Dave Moores
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 6:09 AM
To: 'C320-List'
Subject: Re: [C320-list] Club Racing the C320


Beer after, also wine...but we carry the beer in cans to save weight.
That makes it a race boat in my book!

Dave M

-----Original Message-----
From: c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com
[mailto:c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com] On Behalf Of Adam Weiner
Sent: August 28, 2007 12:12 AM
To: 'C320-List'
Subject: Re: [C320-list] Club Racing the C320


Nice.  That is true.  But if you were serious about racing, wouldn't you
buy a race boat?  Let's take it one step further:  is there beer
consumed before or during the race?

Adam

-----Original Message-----
From: c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com
[mailto:c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com] On Behalf Of pat reynolds
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 8:18 PM
To: C320-List
Subject: Re: [C320-list] Club Racing the C320


All racing is serious!

--- Adam Weiner <esquirecatering at rcn.com> wrote:

> I only have one question:  If you want to race
> seriously then what in
> the hell are you doing with a Catalina 320?  Notice
> I didn't respond to
> the comment about me?
> 
> Adam
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com 
> [mailto:c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com] On Behalf Of Scott Thompson
> Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 4:03 PM
> To: C320-List
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Club Racing the C320
> 
> 
> Because the rules are made by serious racers, and no
> serious racer wants
> 
> a rule change that would generally make it better to
> have a slower
> sailing boat.  Few racers, even on San Francisco
> Bay, share Adam's
> rapture about the the benefits of using a fixed prop
> as a brake!  The
> rules are thus biased in favor of racing gear over
> cruising gear, and no
> 
> one believes that they equalize all boats.  If
> that's what you are after
> 
> switch to a strict one design class and get out of
> PHRF.
> 
> For what it's worth, I believe that folding props
> are faster than
> feathering ones, and if you really want to race
> successfully you will do
> 
> better with a small two-bladed folder that folds
> into a really compact
> and streamlined package (e.g. the nicer Martec) than
> with any other
> prop.  On the other hand, if you are really that
> serious about racing
> then the 320 isn't a very good choice of boat in the
> first place.  I 
> love to cruise my 320 and I love to race.  But I
> race boats that are 
> designed for speed, not cruising comfort.
> 
> Scott
> 
> chris denny wrote:
> > If it is generally accepted that a folder is that
> much of a benefit,
> > why
> > is the allowance for a fixed prop not greater? I
> thought the idea was
> to
> > make things "equal".  Is 6 seconds the "standard
> addition" for a fixed
> 
> > prop?
> > cd #328
> > Peter Clancy wrote:
> > 
> >> Casual racers may underestimate the value of
> relatively small speed
> >> improvements.
> >>
> >> For example, assume a course is 15 nautical miles
> long. If you have a
> >> modest 1/2 knot per mile speed advantage (with a
> folding prop) over
> an
> >> identical boat with a fixed prop and you average
> 6.5 knots, by the
> >> time you reach the finish  you'll be at least 10
> minutes ahead of the
> 
> >> slower boat. If that boat has a 6 second per mile
> rating advantage
> due
> >> to a fixed prop, he only gains 90 seconds or 1.5
> minutes when
> >> corrected. Generally speaking, the lighter the
> air, the greater the
> >> benefit of a folding prop. We raced 'AROBAN'
> successfully for several
> 
> >> years with a Gori two-blade folder and took first
> in class in last
> >> October's Columbus Day Regatta which is South
> Florida's largest
> annual
> >> sailboat race.
> >> The C320 is a capable racer especially when
> tweaked and sailed for
> >> optimum speed.
> >>
> >> Peter Clancy
> >> 'AROBAN' #222 (former owner)
> >> Miami, FL
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  ----- Origi nal Message -----  From: Joe 
> >> Barrett<mailto:joe at dolphinmortgage.com>  To: 
> >> 'C320-List'<mailto:c320-list at catalina320.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August
> >> 21, 2007 9:19 AM
> >>  Subject: Re: [C320-list] Club Racing the C320
> >>
> >>
> >>  If going from a fixed to a feathering/folding
> prop gains you 1/2-3/4
> >> knot of
> >>  speed do the math. The 6 seconds you loose makes
> getting a
> >>  feathering/folding prop a no brainer.
> >>  Joe Barrett
> >>
> >>  -----Original Message-----
> >>  From:
> >>
>
c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com<mailto:c320-list-bounces at catalina320.o
> rg> 
> >>
> >>  [mailto:c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com] On
> Behalf Of chris denny
> >>  Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 10:05 AM
> >>  To: C320-List
> >>  Subject: Re: [C320-list] Club Racing the C320
> >>
> >>     If a folder is that much help, why does
> having a fixed prop get
> >> you just 6
> >>  seconds on your adjusted PHRF?
> >>  CD #328
> >>
> >>  
> >>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 



       
________________________________________________________________________
____________
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's
updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow  



- -----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.




More information about the C320-list mailing list