[C320-list] volunteering to serve as an officer for this great owners association

Orlando.Duran at AveryDennison.com Orlando.Duran at AveryDennison.com
Sat Sep 1 06:56:22 PDT 2007


Good on you Bruce!

You are my new role model.... :)
----------------------------------
Regards,
OD

Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld


----- Original Message -----
From: "brucestanley" [brucestanley at optusnet.com.au]
Sent: 09/01/2007 03:52 AM
To: "C320-List" <c320-list at catalina320.com>
Subject: Re: [C320-list] volunteering to serve as an officer for this	great	owners association

Orlando you have obviously heard that I have switched from a snow shoe to a
thong (Aussie Yellow of course)

B
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Orlando.Duran at AveryDennison.com>
To: "Catalina 320 List" <C320-List at catalina320.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2007 9:15 AM
Subject: Re: [C320-list] volunteering to serve as an officer for this great
owners association


> Aussies ok but no more Canadians!! :)
>
>
> ----------------------------------
> Regards,
> OD
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kirk McCullough" [kirk.mccullough at telus.net]
> Sent: 08/31/2007 03:13 PM
> To: "C320-List" <c320-list at catalina320.com>
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] volunteering to serve as an officer for this
> great owners association
>
> About 7 or 8 years ago John Langford, from Victoria BC (Canada), professor
> at the University of Victoria, was the Commodore. I think he was the first
> non US resident to hold the position. He moved up in size a couple of
> years ago so he's no longer on the list.
>
> I saw his old C320 sailing by in the Gulf Islands this summer; still looks
> great. I bought a very lightly used 135 jib from him last year which he
> had purchased for his 320 and kept for his new boat, but then decided he
> didn't need it.
>
> This is after all, the C320 International Association; Go for it Bruce.
>
> Kirk
> #124
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "LaChance,Michael B" <MBLACHAN at travelers.com>
> To: "C320-List" <c320-list at catalina320.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 4:24 AM
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] volunteering to serve as an officer for this
> great owners association
>
>
> Bruce,
> Thanks for expressing interest. In this age of inexpensive global
> communications I don't see your location as a big issue - the only time
> sensitive activity is the monthly officer's conference call but I'm sure
> we could schedule around the time differences. More importantly, I'm
> sure the organization would be greatly served by having international
> representation on the board. You could be the first and with the number
> of hulls outside the hull you could help ensure non-US owner needs are
> represented. About the only role that would present a real problem would
> be treasurer as the organization uses a US bank for its finances. Roles
> such as Commodore, Vice-Commodore, Mainsheet editor, webmaster can
> easily be done 'offline'. Usually the Commodore engages another
> volunteer to setup the annual regatta (thanks again to Paul Weikel for
> stepping forward this year) so again your location is not really a
> factor. What role were you interested in???
> Mike LaChance
> Commodore 320IA
> Seychelle #141
> Noank, CT
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com
> [mailto:c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com] On Behalf Of brucestanley
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 10:02 PM
> To: C320-List
> Subject: [C320-list] volunteering to serve as an officer for this great
> owners association
>
> to Mike LaChance Commodore 320IA and All C320 Owners
>
> with direct regard to volunteering to serve as an officer for this great
>
> owners association:
>
> I am active on the 'List' and am genuinely willing consider to to serve
> as
> an officer.
> However, I live in Australia and I feel limited as to how I could
> accomplish
> a roll as an officer in this great Association.
>
> Bruce Stanley
> C320  #1084 Fantastic Lady / Sydney Australia
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "LaChance,Michael B" <MBLACHAN at travelers.com>
> To: <C320-List at catalina320.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 1:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Club Racing the C320
>
>
>> All,
>> It would be great if we could convert the enthusiam of some of folks
> on
>> these email threads into volunteering to serve as an officer for this
>> great owners association. Most of the roles require very little time
>> commitment - in some cases less time on a monthly basis than reading
> and
>> deleting all these messages! Contact me or simply reply to the list if
>
>> you're interested.
>> Mike LaChance
>> Commodore 320IA
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> This message is being sent from my Blackberry
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com
>> <c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com>
>> To: c320-list at catalina320.com <c320-list at catalina320.com>
>> Sent: Wed Aug 29 10:55:22 2007
>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Club Racing the C320
>>
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>> I had PropSpeed applied by my yard.? As I remember, it was about $250
> for
>> the PS and labor plus the cost of the haul out.
>>
>> My boat is being hauled this week, but I will have to rely on the yard
> to
>> describe the condition of the running gear, as I'll be in GA and my
> boat's
>> in FL.
>>
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: brucestanley <brucestanley at optusnet.com.au>
>> To: C320-List <c320-list at catalina320.com>
>> Sent: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:10 pm
>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Club Racing the C320
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Mike?
>> I would appreciate hearing from you as to how your PropSpeed has
> lasted.?
>> BTW did you know you have to remove all of the Pspeed prior to re
> applying
>> a new coat??
>> Our experience is 12 mths +?
>> When you say the cost of PropSpeed is so expensive ... are you buying
> the
>> Pspeed or having someone else do it??
>> ?
>> BruceS #1084?
>> ?
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: <drshoffner at aol.com>?
>> To: <c320-list at catalina320.com>?
>> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 11:00 PM?
>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Club Racing the C320?
>> ?
>>> Thanks.? I used PropSpeed this season also and will haul my boat this
>
>>> week > to have a look, but it's awfully pricey.? A couple of years of
>
>>> PropSpeed > would pay for a Kiwi prop and some bottom paint.?
>>>?
>>> Mike?
>>> #171?
>>>?
>>>?
>>> -----Original Message-----?
>>> From: brucestanley <brucestanley at optusnet.com.au>?
>>> To: C320-List <c320-list at catalina320.com>?
>>> Sent: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 9:21 pm?
>>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Club Racing the C320?
>>>?
>>>?
>>> "How well does the Kiwi hold bottom paint.?"??
>>> The Kiwi prop blades seem to like PropSpeed over the normal
> Ablative/Hard
>>>  > antifouls.??
>>> In Australia a lot of us are using PropSpeed.??
>>> PropSpeed holds over a 12 month period very well.??
>>> Ablative Antifoul will come off the blade tips.??
>>> Some put on a Hard Antifoul (2 coats) then add 2 coats of Ablative.??
>>> This sees them through to a 12 mth period??
>>> ??
>>> Bruce Stanley / Sydney??
>>> ??
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: <drshoffner at aol.com>??
>>> To: <c320-list at catalina320.com>??
>>> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 10:30 AM??
>>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Club Racing the C320??
>>> ??
>>>> How well does the Kiwi hold bottom paint.? In FL where my boat
> lives, >
>>>>  >> marine growth on the runnng gear is a bigger problem than the
> bottom,
>>>> and >> > I have not yet found a solution to prevent this.??
>>>>??
>>>> Mike??
>>>> #171??
>>>>??
>>>>??
>>>> -----Original Message-----??
>>>> From: Kirk McCullough <kirk.mccullough at telus.net>??
>>>> To: C320-List <c320-list at catalina320.com>??
>>>> Sent: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 7:39 pm??
>>>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Club Racing the C320??
>>>>??
>>>>??
>>>> Good input Scott.???
>>>> ???
>>>> On feathering props, the Kiwi is unique in the way it feathers. It
> is 3
>>>>  > >> balded and feathers each blade independantly. Each blade
> aligns
>>>> with the >> > flow independ of shaft angle, where the shaft stops
>>>> rotating (ie no >> need > to lock the shaft to be sure blades are
> folded
>>>> properly) >> independant also > of underbody shape, heel etc etc.
> Other
>>>> feathering >> props are made so all > blades are feathered at the
> same
>>>> angle and don't >> consider shaft angle > etc.???
>>>> ???
>>>> Kirk???
>>>> Boomerang #124???
>>>> ???
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Thompson" >>
>>>> <sthompson at toad.net>???
>>>> To: "C320-List" <c320-list at catalina320.com>???
>>>> Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 4:02 PM???
>>>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Club Racing the C320???
>>>> ???
>>>>> Because the rules are made by serious racers, and no serious racer
>>>>> wants >>> >> a > rule change that would generally make it better to
>
>>>>> have a slower >>> >> sailing > boat. Few racers, even on San
> Francisco
>>>>> Bay, share Adam's >>> >> rapture about > the the benefits of using
> a
>>>>> fixed prop as a brake! >>> The >> rules are thus > biased in favor
> of
>>>>> racing gear over cruising >>> gear, and >> no one believes > that
> they
>>>>> equalize all boats. If that's >>> what you are >> after switch to a
>>
>>>>> strict one design class and get out >>> of PHRF.???
>>>>>???
>>>>> For what it's worth, I believe that folding props are faster than >
>>>
>>>>>  >>> feathering ones, and if you really want to race successfully
> you
>>>>> will do >>> >> > better with a small two-bladed folder that folds
> into
>>>>> a really >>> compact >> and > streamlined package (e.g. the nicer
>>>>> Martec) than with >>> any other >> prop. On > the other hand, if
> you
>>>>> are really that serious >>> about racing >> then the 320 > isn't a
> very
>>>>> good choice of boat in the >>> first place. I >> love to cruise my
>>
>>>>> 320 and I love to race. But I race >>> boats that are >> designed
> for
>>>>> speed, not > cruising comfort.???
>>>>>???
>>>>> Scott???
>>>>>???
>>>>> chris denny wrote:???
>>>>>> If it is generally accepted that a folder is that much of a
> benefit,
>>>>>>  >>>> why >>> >> is the allowance for a fixed prop not greater? I
>>>>>> thought the >>>> idea was >>> to >> make things "equal". Is 6
> seconds
>>>>>> the "standard >>>> addition" for a >>> fixed >> prop????
>>>>>> cd #328???
>>>>>> Peter Clancy wrote:???
>>>>>>???
>>>>>>> Casual racers may underestimate the value of relatively small
> speed
>>>>>>>  >>>>> >>> >>>> improvements.???
>>>>>>>???
>>>>>>> For example, assume a course is 15 nautical miles long. If you
> have a
>>>>>>>  >>>>> >>>> >>> modest 1/2 knot per mile speed advantage (with a
>>>>>>> folding >>>>> prop) over >>>> an >>> identical boat with a fixed
> prop
>>>>>>> and you >>>>> average 6.5 knots, by >>>> the time >>> you reach
> the
>>>>>>> finish you'll be >>>>> at least 10 minutes ahead >>>> of the
> slower
>>>>>>>  >>> boat. If that boat >>>>> has a 6 second per mile rating >>>>
>
>>>>>>> advantage due to a >>> fixed prop, >>>>> he only gains 90 seconds
> or
>>>>>>> 1.5 >>>> minutes when corrected. >>> >>>>> Generally speaking,
> the
>>>>>>> lighter the air, >>>> the greater the benefit >>>>> of a >>>
> folding
>>>>>>> prop. We raced 'AROBAN' >>>> successfully for several >>>>> years
>
>>>>>>> with a >>> Gori two-blade folder and >>>> took first in class in
>>>>>>>  >>>>> last October's Columbus >>> Day Regatta which is >>>>
> South
>>>>>>> Florida's >>>>> largest annual sailboat race.???
>>>>>>> The C320 is a capable racer especially when tweaked and sailed
> for
>>>>>>>  >>> >>>>> >>>> optimum speed.???
>>>>>>>???
>>>>>>> Peter Clancy???
>>>>>>> 'AROBAN' #222 (former owner)???
>>>>>>> Miami, FL???
>>>>>>>???
>>>>>>>???
>>>>>>>???
>>>>>>>???
>>>>>>>???
>>>>>>>???
>>>>>>>???
>>>>>>> ----- Origi nal Message ----- From: Joe >>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>> Barrett<mailto:joe at dolphinmortgage.com> To: >>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>> 'C320-List'<mailto:c320-list at catalina320.com> Sent: Tuesday,
> August
>>>>>>>  >>>>> 21, >>>> >>> 2007 9:19 AM???
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Club Racing the C320???
>>>>>>>???
>>>>>>>???
>>>>>>> If going from a fixed to a feathering/folding prop gains you
> 1/2-3/4
>>>>>>>  >>>>> >>>> >>> knot of???
>>>>>>> speed do the math. The 6 seconds you loose makes getting a???
>>>>>>> feathering/folding prop a no brainer.???
>>>>>>> Joe Barrett???
>>>>>>>???
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----???
>>>>>>> From: >>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>>
> c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com<mailto:c320-list-bounces at catalina320.o
> rg>???
>>>>>>> [mailto:c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com] On Behalf Of chris
>>>>>>> denny???
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 10:05 AM???
>>>>>>> To: C320-List???
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Club Racing the C320???
>>>>>>>???
>>>>>>> If a folder is that much help, why does having a fixed prop get
> you
>>>>>>>  >>>>> >>> >>>> just 6???
>>>>>>> seconds on your adjusted PHRF????
>>>>>>> CD #328???
>>>>>>>???
>>>>>>>???
>>>>>>???
>>>>>>???
>>>>>>???
>>>>>???
>>>>>???
>>>>>???
>>>>> -- > No virus found in this incoming message.???
>>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: >
>>>
>>>>>  >>> 269.12.8/973 - Release Date: 8/25/2007 5:00 PM???
>>>>>???
>>>>> ???
>>>>??
>>>>??
>>>>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ??
>>>> Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL
> Mail! -
>>>>  > >> http://mail.aol.com ??
>>>?
>>>?
>>>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ?
>>> Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail!
> - >
>>> http://mail.aol.com ?
>>
>>
>>
> ________________________________________________________________________
>> Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail!
> -
>> http://mail.aol.com
>>
>>
>>
> ========================================================================
> ======
>> This communication, together with any attachments hereto or links
>> contained herein, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
> may
>> contain information that is confidential or legally protected. If you
> are
>> not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
>> disclosure, copying, dissemination, distribution or use of this
>> communication is STRICTLY PROHIBITED.  If you have received this
>> communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return
>
>> e-mail message and delete the original and all copies of the
>> communication, along with any attachments hereto or links herein, from
>
>> your system.
>>
>>
> ========================================================================
> ======
>> The Travelers e-mail system made this annotation on 08/29/07,
> 11:10:32.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ==============================================================================
> This communication, together with any attachments hereto or links
> contained herein, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
> contain information that is confidential or legally protected. If you are
> not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
> disclosure, copying, dissemination, distribution or use of this
> communication is STRICTLY PROHIBITED.  If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return
> e-mail message and delete the original and all copies of the
> communication, along with any attachments hereto or links herein, from
> your system.
>
> ==============================================================================
> The Travelers e-mail system made this annotation on 08/31/07, 07:24:30.
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.13.1/982 - Release Date: 8/31/2007
> 5:21 PM
>
>
>
> - -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
> taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
> entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
> this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any
> computer.
>
>



- -----------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.




More information about the C320-list mailing list