[C320-list] SAIL Mar 09 re C320

[crashley at gte.net]

I have one question on the Mk II article. Is the cockpit really wider as it 
says on the first page? I've seen the boat at shows but did not notice that. 
Seems like that would take away from the aft cabin volume and headroom.

CRA
Rosebud #882


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Monte B." <mjbc60 at sbcglobal.net>
To: <C320-List at Catalina320.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: [C320-list] SAIL Mar 09 re C320


> To crashley, thanks for the scan. As for the review, with a couple of
> Catalina brochures I could have done that review without leaving the 
> house.
> Might be why I let my Sail mag. subscription lapse. I do agree that if you
> are 6 foot 4 the clearance between the helm and the stern seat is close 
> and
> my stern seat has been in the dock box for about 8 years.
>
>   Monte Laima #620
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: c320-list-bounces at lists.catalina320.com
> [mailto:c320-list-bounces at lists.catalina320.com] On Behalf Of Joe Barrett
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 11:50 AM
> To: C320-List at catalina320.com
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] SAIL Mar 09 re C320
>
> Amazing how many sailing reviews of all kinds of boats are done in 5 knots
> of wind!
> Joe
> ------------------------------------
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: c320-list-bounces at lists.catalina320.com
> [mailto:c320-list-bounces at lists.catalina320.com] On Behalf Of Len
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 12:30 PM
> To: C320-List at catalina320.com
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] SAIL Mar 09 re C320
>
> Thanks---not an exciting review, and they got the number wrong "1,039" for
> total 320's before 320 Mk II.  My boat is 1070, one of the final 4 made in
> CA.  I believe the MkII was around # 1100 made in Largo, FL.  Also, at 
> least
> on 320's, no problem standing at helm.  And no mention of speed  or great
> sailing in 18-20+ knot wind, etc.
>
> Len
> AQUA5   #1070
>
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:55 PM, <crashley at gte.net> wrote:
>
>> Okay, I scanned it.
>>
>> Here it is.
>>
>> http://www.catalina320.com/gallery/album105
>>
>> Note: The sideview plan of the boat (on second page) is cut off at the
>> stern.
>>
>> CRA
>> Rosebud #882
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Len" <aqua5len at gmail.com>
>> To: <C320-List at catalina320.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 8:08 AM
>> Subject: Re: [C320-list] SAIL Mar 09 re C320
>>
>>
>> > Not sure, but my understanding is that if for limited, i.e., less
>> > than
>> 500
>> > readers, private use
>> > of out-of-date issues (April '08 issue now on stands) there are no
>> > concerns.
>> >
>> > Len
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:28 PM, <crashley at gte.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I have it, but that might violate copyright laws....
>> >>
>> >> CRA
>> >> Rosebud #882
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >> From: "Len" <aqua5len at gmail.com>
>> >> To: "C320 List" <C320-List at Catalina320.org>
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 3:02 PM
>> >> Subject: [C320-list] SAIL Mar 09 re C320
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Have heard that SAIL magazine March '08 has an article reviewing
>> >> > the
>> >> C320
>> >> > MkII. Cn't find on newstands.  Can someone post article for all
>> >> > of us to read?
>> >> >
>> >> > Len Krane
>> >> > AQUA5   #1070
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>