[C320-list] Genoa: 120 v 150

[Henderson, David]

I purchased my 320 in 2005 and sail it primarily in the light winds of
Cape Cod Bay.  In retrospect, after three seasons with the 150, I wish I
had opted for the 135.  The 150 just doesn't hold any kind of decent
shape when partially furled, and it is big and unwieldy to handle.
Further, I am not convinced that performance is significantly better
than the 135 in any conditions.  And while we're on the topic of
hindsight, I also wish I had purchased the regular main with the
Dutchman system, but the broker who sold me the boat talked me into the
in mast furling, which is convenient and generally works OK, but I know
I am losing out on performance with that decision.

Dave 
Dottie B  1049



Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 18:45:27 -0400
From: dluzader <dluzader at gmail.com>
Subject: [C320-list] Genoa: 120 v 150
To: C320-List at catalina320.com
Message-ID:
	<8b3d7c6e0805271545x6452c151v3bdb14a35adeca11 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I'm in the process of ordering a new 320.  Can anyone share thoughts
on genoa size?  I'm replacing my Catalina 27 on the Chesapeake.  Is it
worth going with the 150 over the 120 for the light air we have around
here?  Also, any thoughts on opting for battens on a furling main?
Many thanks for the help!


------------------------------