[C320-list] engine hours
BAdams3491 at aol.com
BAdams3491 at aol.com
Wed Jan 27 11:20:33 PST 2010
Those hours should not bother anybody that knows anything about diesel
engines. I have diesel pick up I use to haul a big 5th wheel. When I bought
it everybody said the diesel is not broken in until it has about 30k on
it. I don't know how this correlates to a boat engine, but once I got to
30k, the MPG got better!
Bert
At Ease
#442
In a message dated 1/26/2010 11:57:10 A.M. Central Standard Time,
robert.seastream at comcast.net writes:
My boat had about 110 hours on it when I purchased it at three seasons
old. Tell buyers that engine hours vary greatly due to why the engine
is used: travel time to offshore, days with/without wind, schedules,
don't know how to sail, etc. Tell 'em that diesels are more reliable
than gas engines at least since they've no ignition system to
maintain. A well maintained diesel should go at least 5000 hours
between overhauls (NOT replacement), sometimes longer.
Bob Seastream
Intuition # 906
On Jan 26, 2010, at 11:23 AM, Dave Anderer wrote:
> I've learned from my aircraft mechanic to prefer mechanical devices
> that
> have been used and well-maintained rather than ones that have sat
> ignored.
>
>> From my perspective, 1680 hours with decent maintenance is no
>> drawback.
> Heck - it tells me the boat was used - a good thing.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:14 AM, james_delong
> <james_delong at bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
>> Guys,
>>
>> My Catalina 320, hull number 453, is 'softly' on the market. By
>> softly I
>> mean it is not a full fledged marketing campaign. It is listed
>> only on the
>> 320 web page and on Sailboat Listings.
>>
>> Since October I have only received 6 calls and one visit scheduled
>> for this
>> Thursday.
>>
>> A couple of other potentials have fallen through because the they
>> thought
>> the engine hours were too high. Folks seem to be looking for a 13
>> year old
>> boat with less than 500 hours!
>>
>> This is a Yanmar 3GM30 Japanese version engine with 1680 hours.
>>
>> I've read you should run these often and hard. In fact this months
>> Sail
>> Magazine recommends at least 4 hours at full operating temperature
>> at hull
>> speed every month. Just doing that I would have accumulated over
>> 600 hours.
>>
>> The question is: What argument can be made for high vs. low
>> hours? Is low
>> always better, or do low hours present a different set of problems
>> vs. high
>> hours in an engine that has been well maintained?
>>
>> How much 'value' is lost do the high hours or is this just a
>> perception
>> issue?
>>
>> Thanks! Jim #453
>>
More information about the C320-list
mailing list