[C320-list] Outhaul lost in boom

Irving Grunes igrunes at gmail.com
Wed Jun 16 10:26:42 PDT 2010


Bruce and all,
Go to
https://mail.google.com/mail/?shva=1#inbox/1293f20e5e10f0cb
and look at page 13

Th#2 block is fixed where the boom meets the mast.
The Beckett of the #1 block has a line attached that exits the end of the
boom and we use that as the outhaul.

If you look through the C320 website and I think the manu, it showed another
kind of floating block that was a piece of metal with a pulley on each end.

This was a scheme using that double pulley for a single line (Jiffy )
reefing system where the reefing line to the luff reefing cringle went thru
one  pulley. Then another line that terminated at the end of the boom went
thru the second pully back to the end of the boom up to the leech reefing
cringle. So that when the reefing line from the cockpit is pulled , it also
pulled the luff and leech reefing lines at one time.
I think that scheme has been discontinued and from reading the list over the
years, most have removed that pully.
On 2001 #851 there was a two line reefing system, where the hook for the
luff cringle could also be used as a cunningham pull down went to a
starboard side line holder. From the port side a boom straight thru line
went to the leech cringle.

Hope this may clarify whats in the boom of the C320's

Irv Grunes
2001 #851

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Bruce Heyman <bruceheyman at cox.net> wrote:

> Irv,
> You got my curiosity going.  On our association web site in the manual
> there
> is a drawing showing the reeving for a single line mainsail reef number
> one.
> It shows that there are two separate lines in the boom and their lengths
> are
> provided on the drawing for standing and running rigging lengths.
> Unfortunately I was not able to find any drawings or discussion on the
> outhaul anywhere.  So I guess I don't know how 671's out haul is reeved.
> Best,
> Bruce
> Somerset #671 SoCal
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: c320-list-bounces at lists.catalina320.com
> [mailto:c320-list-bounces at lists.catalina320.com] On Behalf Of Irving
> Grunes
> Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 8:15 AM
> To: C320-List at catalina320.com
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Outhaul lost in boom
>
> Bruce,
> I am not confusing the 3:1 purchase block for the outhaul with the the
> double sheave block that was used for jiffy reefing on some boats..
> #851 does not have that jiffy reefing block.
> Irv
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 9:38 AM, <bruceheyman at cox.net> wrote:
>
> > Irv,
> > I don't have my manual here but I thought they both had blocks in the
> boom.
> >  I may not be remember right as it was several years ago when we added
> the
> > second reef.  I thought the line length table listed two lines for both
> the
> > out haul and the first reef.
> > Bruce
> > Somerset 671 SoCal
> > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Irving Grunes <igrunes at gmail.com>
> > Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 08:46:12
> > To: <C320-List at catalina320.com>
> > Subject: Re: [C320-list] Outhaul lost in boom
> >
> > Bruce,
> > Then what do u use for outhaul.
> > Irv Grunes
> > 2001 #851
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:21 AM, <bruceheyman at cox.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Irv,
> > > I thought the first reef had a block for extra purchase and the second
> > reef
> > > was straight through.
> > > Bruce
> > > Somerset 671 Socal
> > > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Irving Grunes <igrunes at gmail.com>
> > > Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 07:23:12
> > > To: <C320-List at catalina320.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [C320-list] Outhaul lost in boom
> > >
> > > All,
> > > Trying to make sense of all of the posts on this subject.
> > > There seems to be some confusion as which line is to be used for what.
> > >
> > > We use the internal floating block with the 3:1 purchase for the
> outhaul.
> > >
> > > We use the straight through line as the reefing line.
> > >
> > > Irv Grunes
> > > 2001 #851
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Larry Frank <WindSwept at stx.rr.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have often wondered the reason for the internal block.  It does
> mean
> > > that
> > > > there is twice as much line holding the tack and clew down and with
> two
> > > > lines there will be less stretch than one.  Any stretch in the
> reefing
> > > > lines
> > > > during a gust will allow the tack and clew to raise a little making
> the
> > > > sail
> > > > draft deeper adding to the heeling forces, just what you do not want
> to
> > > > happen at this point.
> > > >
> > > > You could accomplish a reduction in stretch by using a higher tech
> low
> > > > stretch line too.
> > > >
> > > > Larry
> > > > Windswept C320 #246
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: c320-list-bounces at lists.catalina320.com
> > > > [mailto:c320-list-bounces at lists.catalina320.com] On Behalf Of
> MICHAEL
> > > COLE
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 12:00 AM
> > > > To: Catalina320
> > > > Subject: [C320-list] Outhaul lost in boom
> > > >
> > > > Peter I took that internal block out some years ago when putting in a
> > 2nd
> > > > reefing line. I've never missed it . Both reefing lines work
> perfectly
> > > well
> > > > without it
> > > >               Mike Cole     "Mio Dio" # 421
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>



More information about the C320-list mailing list