[C320-list] Intermittent list emails - and a NEW TOPIC TOILET RELATED!

[Joe M]

You need the old line. Anti siphon goes up to medicine cabinet.

On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 4:48 PM David Prudden <dprudden at icloud.com> wrote:

> Feel free to build a new discussion list….
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Aug 9, 2022, at 4:24 PM, Greg Arnold <greg-arnold at gmx.com> wrote:
> >
> >    It is easier to read old threads if you don't suddenly change the
> topic
> >   in the middle of the thread.  Could you start a new thread?
> >   Greg
> >   2005 #1054
> >
> >   On 8/9/2022 12:51 PM, David Wellerstein wrote:
> >
> > And now that I have everyone’s attention…. :)
> >
> > I am planning to replace the toilet on my C320.  The current toilet has
> a leak i
> > n the pump and for an extra $100 I thought I would just replace the
> whole thing
> > rather than just the pump assembly.  Also, I can now get a standard size
> bowl vs
> > . a compact sized toilet currently installed.
> >
> > There seems to be a hose running from the flushing pump outlet tail to
> the toile
> > t that goes through the back of the head rather than straight across
> like the on
> > e supplied with the new toilet.  Can I just use the new line or should I
> connect
> > the existing lines that run behind the head wall?  Is there a reason for
> that c
> > onfiguration that I’m missing?  This is a standard Jabsco marine toilet.
> >
> > Are there any other gotchas to doing this seemingly simple swap (I know,
> famous
> > last words…the easiest of jobs always turn into complications of the
> unexpected
> > variety when it comes to boat maintenance).
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > David
> > “Dream Catcher” #118
> >
> > David Wellerstein | [1]dwellers at mac.com | 925.301.6581 (m)
> >
> >
> > On Aug 9, 2022, at 11:40 AM, David Wellerstein [2]<dwellers at mac.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Full agreement here.
> >
> > #118
> >
> > David Wellerstein | [3]dwellers at mac.com | 925.301.6581 (m)
> >
> >
> > On Aug 9, 2022, at 11:33 AM, Graeme Clark [4]<cg at skyflyer.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > About 11 years ago, when I joined this list, I got well and truly flamed
> for dar
> > ing to suggest that we migrate to something  a little more modern!  To
> be fair,
> > eleven years ago cellphone coverage and smartphones weren't what they
> are today,
> > so the argument was that an email-style list was very low on data usage
> and ban
> > dwidth requirements and could be relied upon when trying to get an
> answer to a p
> > roblem whilst upside down in the aft lazarette locker, using a Nokia
> 3220 phone
> > whilst ten miles offshore.
> >
> > AT the risk of being flamed again; is it time to revisit this?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Graeme Clark
> > #366, 1996
> >
> >
> > On 9 Aug 2022, at 19:21, Mike Bird [5]<mgb-avalon at yosemite.net> wrote:
> >
> > Spam filters don't like the way this list is setup so a lot of
> > messages get filtered out.
> >
> > These days setting up a mailing list on a service that is not
> > linked to spam and then getting it to correctly process SPF,
> > DKIM, and DMARC is a lot more difficult than it used to be.
> >
> > --Mike
> >
> > X-Spam-Status: (personal data omitted)
> tests=CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH,DKIM_INVALID,
> >        DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,
> >        HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,
> >        RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,
> >        T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=disabled version=3.4.6
> >
> > References
> >
> >   1. mailto:dwellers at mac.com
> >   2. mailto:dwellers at mac.com
> >   3. mailto:dwellers at mac.com
> >   4. mailto:cg at skyflyer.co.uk
> >   5. mailto:mgb-avalon at yosemite.net
>