[C320-list] Intermittent list emails - and a NEW TOPIC TOILET RELATED!

[David Prudden]

Feel free to build a new discussion list….

Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 9, 2022, at 4:24 PM, Greg Arnold <greg-arnold at gmx.com> wrote:
> 
>    It is easier to read old threads if you don't suddenly change the topic
>   in the middle of the thread.  Could you start a new thread?
>   Greg
>   2005 #1054
> 
>   On 8/9/2022 12:51 PM, David Wellerstein wrote:
> 
> And now that I have everyone’s attention…. :)
> 
> I am planning to replace the toilet on my C320.  The current toilet has a leak i
> n the pump and for an extra $100 I thought I would just replace the whole thing
> rather than just the pump assembly.  Also, I can now get a standard size bowl vs
> . a compact sized toilet currently installed.
> 
> There seems to be a hose running from the flushing pump outlet tail to the toile
> t that goes through the back of the head rather than straight across like the on
> e supplied with the new toilet.  Can I just use the new line or should I connect
> the existing lines that run behind the head wall?  Is there a reason for that c
> onfiguration that I’m missing?  This is a standard Jabsco marine toilet.
> 
> Are there any other gotchas to doing this seemingly simple swap (I know, famous
> last words…the easiest of jobs always turn into complications of the unexpected
> variety when it comes to boat maintenance).
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> David
> “Dream Catcher” #118
> 
> David Wellerstein | [1]dwellers at mac.com | 925.301.6581 (m)
> 
> 
> On Aug 9, 2022, at 11:40 AM, David Wellerstein [2]<dwellers at mac.com> wrote:
> 
> Full agreement here.
> 
> #118
> 
> David Wellerstein | [3]dwellers at mac.com | 925.301.6581 (m)
> 
> 
> On Aug 9, 2022, at 11:33 AM, Graeme Clark [4]<cg at skyflyer.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> About 11 years ago, when I joined this list, I got well and truly flamed for dar
> ing to suggest that we migrate to something  a little more modern!  To be fair,
> eleven years ago cellphone coverage and smartphones weren't what they are today,
> so the argument was that an email-style list was very low on data usage and ban
> dwidth requirements and could be relied upon when trying to get an answer to a p
> roblem whilst upside down in the aft lazarette locker, using a Nokia 3220 phone
> whilst ten miles offshore.
> 
> AT the risk of being flamed again; is it time to revisit this?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Graeme Clark
> #366, 1996
> 
> 
> On 9 Aug 2022, at 19:21, Mike Bird [5]<mgb-avalon at yosemite.net> wrote:
> 
> Spam filters don't like the way this list is setup so a lot of
> messages get filtered out.
> 
> These days setting up a mailing list on a service that is not
> linked to spam and then getting it to correctly process SPF,
> DKIM, and DMARC is a lot more difficult than it used to be.
> 
> --Mike
> 
> X-Spam-Status: (personal data omitted) tests=CTE_8BIT_MISMATCH,DKIM_INVALID,
>        DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,
>        HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,
>        RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,
>        T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=disabled version=3.4.6
> 
> References
> 
>   1. mailto:dwellers at mac.com
>   2. mailto:dwellers at mac.com
>   3. mailto:dwellers at mac.com
>   4. mailto:cg at skyflyer.co.uk
>   5. mailto:mgb-avalon at yosemite.net