[C320-list] Questions -- Chain?

[Jeffrey Hare]

I don't have a good reason really for the swivel other than it seems much
easier to get the anchor facing the right way when it hits the anchor
roller.  :)  A couple times though, the anchor line got a little twisted for
some reason and wanted to kink up when it got into the boat.  Kind of like a
phone cord. Once I let the anchor hang in deep water and the twist came out.
I figured the swivel would prevent that, but haven't used the anchor since
installing it.

-JeffH

-----Original Message-----
From: c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com
[mailto:c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com] On Behalf Of Scott Thompson
Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 5:14 PM
To: C320-List
Subject: Re: [C320-list] Questions -- Chain?

Are these interchangeable with respect to the chain gypsy?  Also, why do 
you need a swivel on the anchor.  I don't use that much chain, but with 
primarily rope rode I've never seen any evidence that the system was 
twisting in any serious way.

Jeffrey Hare wrote:
> Hi Darrell,
> 
>    We have 75' of 1/4" High-Test chain.  We used to have about 15' of
5/16"
> Proof coil.  The WM guy gave me a deal on it for $3.00/ft instead of the
> usual $4.50/ft.
> The 1/4 HT is a little over half the weight at around .65lb/ft and adds an
> extra ton of breaking strength.
> 
> To couple it to the anchor rhode and anchor swivel, I ended up using a
5/16"
> Wichard SS Bow shackles that had a breaking strength of around 6000lbs.
The
> largest anchor shackle at west marine that would fit 1/4" ht chain were
only
> half the strength of the Wichard Bow shackle (which is in the rigging
isle).
> The Swivel connector I have is probably the second weakest link... me
being
> the weakest.. :)
> 
> -Jeff
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com
> [mailto:c320-list-bounces at catalina320.com] On Behalf Of Kirk McCullough
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 2:16 PM
> To: C320-List
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Questions
> 
> Darrell
> 
> On your chain question:
> I have 60 feet of 5/16" BB (or is it BBB?) chain which is much heavier per

> foot than other 5/16th chains. Most people are using 1/4" chain which is 
> even lighter. Whether your 100' will be too much weight or not will depend

> on the type of chain you select.
> 
> With the 60' of chain I have, the boat is bow down about 3/8" to1/2" 
> compared with the 20' of 1/4" chain I used to have. But I sleep well at 
> anchor, I have never dragged with the heavier chain. We cruise and anchor 
> out a lot.
> 
> I use the Maxwell as is for both the rope and chain. When hauling anchor I

> use 2 wraps on the drum until i get to the chain, then I go with a single 
> wrap once the chain gets there. You still need to tail the winch of
course, 
> but I guess it must take about 1/2 the load, which  allows me to build
some 
> muscle when we anchor somewhere different every night.
> 
> 
> Kirk
> 
> Boomerang #124
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Darrell" <dgray at n-sea.org>
> To: "C320-List" <c320-list at catalina320.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 8:02 AM
> Subject: Re: [C320-list] Questions
> 
> 
>> I have a 94 320, hull number 88. I am wondering if anyone has replaced
the 
>> plastic light covers in the forward berth. Mine are both cracked an 
>> constantly falling off. I have not seen anything exactly the same at West

>> Marine or local chandleries. Maybe  Catalina would be the best contact
for 
>> a replacement. I am also looking for some grey paint to match the nonskid

>> which has a few chips and is wearing thin in places. I know there were
some
> 
>> emails earlier this spring about chain gypsies and I was wondering if 
>> anyone new or remembered if the chain gypsy rope combination was added to

>> the stock Maxwell windlass and was it a Maxwell part. . I would like to
add
> 
>> more chain, possibly up to 100 feet, is that to much weight in the bow? 
>> Lastly, I purchased a loose foot quantum composite main sail off another 
>> C320 owner last year but it was a little big for my existing sail cover
and
> 
>> the dutchman flaking lines didn't line with the way my sail cover was set

>> up. We used it a couple of times and it worked great and is in excellent 
>> shape but I must admit we don't race much and ended up going back to the 
>> stock main for ease of using the cover. I paid $1000 for the sail which I

>> am sure would be $2000 + to replace. I would except a reasonable offer
and 
>> arrange for shipping if anyone is interested.
>>
>> Darrell
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 
>> 269.11.17/951 - Release Date: 8/13/2007 10:15 AM
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
>