[C320-list] Battery Selector Switch
Bill Culbertson
billculb_a2 at yahoo.com
Sun May 20 19:22:05 PDT 2007
Paul,
Right that the batteries are probably at the end of
their useful life as you've speculated and others have
mentioned. Agreed if #1 were topped off and not used,
that it should have worked even if near end-of-life.
One possible contributing factor is that the bilge
pump is hard-wired from the factory to the #1 battery
independent of the battery switch position. If the
bilge pump ran periodically overnight and the battery
is near end-of-life, that could take it down.
-bill
Harmony #859
--- Vpweikel at aol.com wrote:
> We had what I call a strange and unexpected
> occurrence while anchored out
> this weekend.
>
> Before retiring for the night, I was careful to put
> the selector switch on
> battery #2 only so that in case the battery bank was
> drawn down, I'd have
> battery #1 for a back-up to start the engine.
>
> As I expected, the anchor light and a few other
> small miscellaneous uses
> drew the battery down low enough that the engine
> would not crank ( I purposely
> turned the reefer circuit off ). Feeling good about
> the back-up plan, I
> switched over to battery #1 and turned the key.
> Nothing ! Both batteries were
> down.
>
> I know for a fact that the batteries are at least 5
> years old since I have
> not replaced them. The boat is a 1996 and for all I
> know the batteries could
> be 10 years old which is well beyond the normal
> expected life span. But that
> doesn't explain to me satisfactorily why both banks
> were discharged with the
> selector switch set to #2 only. Surely, even a
> tired, old battery would
> hold charge for 14 hours - but maybe I'm wrong.
>
> Has anyone experienced this ?
>
> I'm beginning to think that something must be wired
> wrong or the selector
> switch failed. This was the first real "test" of
> the system that we have done.
> Any suggestions on how to make the proper checks of
> the system both switch
> and house wiring ?
>
> I am planning on replacing the batteries soon. At
> the moment, I just think
> this should not have happened given the precautions
> that were taken.
>
>
> The good news is that, the new portable 1200 Watt
> generator was on-board and
> in 30 minutes running time the batteries were topped
> up enough to start the
> engine and get us underway.
>
>
> Paul Weikel
> Second Chance
> #361
> Georgetown, MD
>
>
>
>
> ************************************** See what's
> free at http://www.aol.com.
>
____________________________________________________________________________________Get the Yahoo! toolbar and be alerted to new email wherever you're surfing.
http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/index.php
More information about the C320-list
mailing list