[C320-list] In-mast Furling

John Frost john at frostnet.net
Fri Sep 11 16:13:23 PDT 2009


We have had in-mast for two seasons and are very happy. Clearly it does not
point as high, but the ease of deployment and stowing makes us use it a lot
more frequently. The biggest change from my years with a normal setup is not
having to tie up and cover the main. In-boom might give you that advantage
without as much performance loss. I have no battens and pay a performance
price for that. The obvious advantage of in-mast is you don't fight gravity.
I pull a string and out she comes. The loose foot also seems to work well in
light air. As always in boat design, it is a tradeoff with no one right
answer. If you want to win races, forget it (or get a ratings adjustment).
If you want an easier day on the water, I say go for it. 

Happy Sailing!

John
2007 C320MKII
Hull 1118
Guntersville, AL

-----Original Message-----
From: c320-list-bounces at lists.catalina320.com
[mailto:c320-list-bounces at lists.catalina320.com] On Behalf Of Julian Elliott
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 2:05 PM
To: C320-List at catalina320.com
Subject: [C320-list] In-mast Furling

After having tricked out my beloved C320 for Northwest cruising, I'm
regretfully considering moving to a newer vessel that is also a bit more
friendly to limited flexibility.  After a soul searching debate with my wife
about going over to the dark side (Nordic Tug), I realize I just can't
compromise the feeling of the wind in my face, and the rush of having the
elements move me along.

 

Short of simply getting a later model C320, I am considering a late model
C34 which has lower freeboard, forward stateroom, etc.  Which brings me to
my question:  In-mast furling.

 

I know the advantages/disadvantages, and everyone has his/her opinion.  I'd
be interested in hearing opinions of anyone who has had experience with
both, especially in an apples-apples comparison, say in the 320.

 

This may have been covered ad nauseum in the past; however, I just
resubscribed to the list a few months ago.

 

Thanks,

 

Julian

Polaris #340






More information about the C320-list mailing list